Cyclingnews TV News Tech Features Road MTB BMX Cyclo-cross Track Photos Fitness Letters Search Forum | ||||||||||||
|
Letters to Cyclingnews - April 25, 2008Here's your chance to get more involved with Cyclingnews. Comments and criticism on current stories, races, coverage and anything cycling related are welcomed, even pictures if you wish. Letters should be brief (less than 300 words), with the sender clearly identified. They may be edited for space and clarity; please stick to one topic per letter. We will normally include your name and place of residence, but not your email address unless you specify in the message. Please email your correspondence to letters@cyclingnews.com. Just shut up and ride Just shut up and ride #1Great stuff Jorge! Get on your bike because you love the sport, not because you get to watch people on television, or read about the guys at the top winning these huge races. Watching the professionals is just a bonus for us who love the sport. Yes, we all probably dream at some point or another about riding with the professionals. But who really cares about what others are doing? Worry about yourself first. Cycling is about the freedom of the road, the rush you get knowing that your body is its own motor. There is no greater feeling than when you hit 45-50 mph under your own power and the wind is blowing all around you. Some of the greatest friendships are built on the bike. You know you love the sport, and have great friendships when you know other riders by their bike, their position on the bike and/or by the way they look in their helmet and sun glasses. Sometimes it gets to the point that you think people look weird when they're not in a helmet. Cycling is a truly self-motivating sport. Bicycles and the sport are going no where as long as there are people who love to get on their bike and just pedal to where ever the road takes them. So like Jorge Perez said "stop the complaining and get out and ride". Complaining about the sport does nothing except keep you from enjoying it. Rubber side down, Friday, April 18 Just shut up and ride #2Amen, brother, amen. Mark Roush Friday, April 18 Just shut up and ride #3Amen brother! Tom Ahlrichs Friday, April 18 Just shut up and ride #4"Who are these people who write all these comments?" - Jorge Perez. Uhhh, you are Jorge. David Hufford Friday, April 18 Just shut up and ride #5Dear Jorge, Of course, if all we did was ride, we wouldn't have time to read the complaints and reply to all the complainers. This is known as the Crank Paradox. Cheers Friday, April 18 ProTour in Russia! China? Ahem... America?Is the UCI insane? Why expand ProTour to China before the USA? Saturday, April 19 BottlesResponding to Matt's question, and a good one at that, small bottles, or "bidons", are popular for no reason other than they look stylish with a matching bike and Euro-kit. I think most people severely underestimate the 'style factor' in road cycling especially. Carrying only one 500ml Euro bidon sends out the message "I'm stylish, and secondarily fast. And if I need more water, I only need summon a domestique to fetch it." Question for Matt: Do you check the mirror before you hit the road for a day of training? The fancy bidons are just a protraction of our self-consciousness on the bike. Zach Williams Friday, April 18 LeMond's 1989 TdFFor this cycling fan, "8 seconds" will always be the ne plus ultra. It still chokes me up whenever I think about it. Greg, you're the best. Keep tellin' it straight, this sport still needs you. David Randleman Saturday, April 19 New format for the Vuelta? #1I've been sucked in by April fools before, but this one takes the cake! Um, A little late though? Chris Branch Friday, April 18 New format for the Vuelta? #2I could barely believe my eyes when I saw your item on the proposed new "Playoff-style" format for the Vuelta. I actually checked my calendar twice to make sure it was indeed April 18th and not April 1st. While the proposed format might be an interesting idea for some new race I doubt that any of the ProTour teams would accept this as it does away with the whole tradition of Grand Tour racing; long stage races that require riders to show that they are capable of riding long miles for three weeks straight, with whole teams sacrificing themselves to keep their leaders safe. If the Vuelta organizers want to make the race more interesting maybe they should change the format by changing the usual trend of a week of flat stages to start off. Why not start in the mountains or with a TTT or a criterium or something unusual? I’m not saying that these radical ideas should be forgotten, but they should definitely be left out of these classic big Grand Tours, at least until the format has proven itself! Maybe this would be more suited to the proposed Tour of America? Andrew Rockwell Friday, April 18 New format for the Vuelta? #3Hi, Victor Cordero is right to think to shake up the first week of the Vuelta, or all of the Grand Tour, as often little happens during those first few days. But having a "playoff" and eliminating teams and adding new riders after that first week isn't the answer. It's too radical, and what if one team is so strong they don't use their leader the first week but make the playoff and then bring their fresh leader in to win the race? What often makes Grand Tours boring is the first week - and this especially applies to the Tour de France; it's basically five-seven completely flat stages that end in big bunch sprints. The sprints are exciting, but after 200 km of rolling. And they don't shake up or challenge general classification or bring out the leaders. That's the problem. If you want to make the first week of a Grand Tour more interesting, throw in a stage with a mountain top finish, a longer prologue, or an uphill time trial, and always have a team time trial. Or a combination of or all of the above. That would shake things up and sort things out, while generating a lot of interest. You could always put a flat stage or two in there, or a few after that to appease the sprinters. P Anderson Tuesday, April 22 Scars of warZack Vestal has the following to say in his post-Cape Epic wrap: "[Our Soigneur Laura] commented on some of the things we don’t see reported when stories of the race are published. She noted how poverty and scars of war are easy to see just outside the race venue. While the race traverses wealthy areas and is safe, there are places just beyond the course and camping that are riddled with crime and crushing poverty. Laura said the contrast between rich and poor is stark, and hard to stomach at times." In general, I think it is important to recognize that the gorgeous playground that the Epic traverses is also a place with deep, and in some respects intractable social and economic difficulties. But I feel compelled to point out that the Western Cape has not been at war since 1902, so while the gorgeous countryside is blighted by poverty in places, and while crime is a problem in some of the same places, there are no "scars of war", unless Mr Vestal has a larger, metaphorical "war" in mind. To be sure, apartheid was a war conducted by the then government against the people of the country, that left the social landscape permanently scarred, but it was not a full scale armed conflict. So, if you come and ride the Cape Epic do expect to experience some of the contradictions that middle-income emerging democracies tend to throw up - not least a sharp contrast between wealth and poverty - but don't expect bomb-craters or bullet-pocked buildings. If you are looking sights of that kind, I'd recommend Los Angeles, or possibly Berlin. And if you are looking to ameliorate your conscience after riding $5000 of carbon fiber past a hungry kid, remember that your tourist dollars are crucial to the economic development of the area, and that the organizers of the race can put you in touch with a number of worthy charities. Perhaps Trek, its eyes opened by Laura and Mr Vestal would like to honor its South African roots (Trek is a South African word, after all) by donating to one of the local organizations that promotes cycling as a mobility solution for poor communities? Nic Dawes Monday, April 21 LeMond v. ArmstrongGreg LeMond a drama queen? Yeah, OK. This is what Devan Mullins asserts in his letter from April 18, 2008, and he also asserts that LeMond "inserts" himself into these situations to "stir the pot". Are you kidding sir? You have to be, because LeMond did not insert himself into these situations to stir the pot. When Lance won his Tours, and when it was found out that he failed one doping test, and was working with Ferrari, journalists came to LeMond. Due to his standing in the sport as being a great champion cyclist, and a fellow American, they searched out his opinion on the subject. LeMond being a no-nonsense kind of guy gave his un-edited opinion about what he thought might be going on. He's never said that Armstrong doped, but indeed, that he has his suspicions about Armstrong and Ferrari. Looking at all of the known dopers Armstrong beat in his years on top, it's not too hard to be suspicious of what was going on. Anyone who has ever known, or read anything about LeMond, you know he won't hold back on his opinion, and won't sugar coat anything. Is he a "drama queen"? No. I don't think so. Someone who has been there, and has been burned by doping in the sport, I think he has more than a right to complain, he has a mandate to do it. Tom Arsenault Friday, April 18 No tour for Astana #1So let me get this straight, Dan. You think that potential sponsors would not know that Astana was under new management? Who are they going to talk to about sponsorship, the old management? And you think fans do not know this either? However, you think both of these parties definitely do know that Astana made last years race a joke? Get real, anyone who actually watches the Tour knows all about Astana. John Haley Tuesday, April 22 No tour for Astana #2On Don Sprague’s comments approving of ASO’s ban of Astana: I appreciate the “keeping up of appearances” in the marketing world and the Astana name has been linked to doping. However, they cleaned house and abide by the rules. For cycling to have credibility as a professional sport, there must be a solid structure in which those who follow the rules and meet the criteria for competition are allowed to compete. The specter of a sponsor fielding a top team following all of the mandates required to compete and then having that team excluded from the world’s premier venues due to a grudge will kill sponsor interest completely. Look at what happened to Unibet. The sponsors must know on the front end whether its investment will get them on the world stage. If you put up the money and follow the rules, the sanctioning authorities (whoever the hell they are today!) should have an obligation to place those teams in competition. John Barton Friday, April 18 Rock Racing rip off #1Michael Ball’s downfall will be his assertive behavior against the traditional cycling culture. Raising hell and controversy is great for publicity but in the end only wins will make the team viable. (And this, coming from someone that likes the hype he’s creating in a normally drab sport.) Unfortunately, Ball’s lack of racing knowledge and eventual inability to set up a team to be competitive instead of for headlines will stop him in his tracks. This is evident by the departure of Frankie Andreu over Ball basically hiring guys without first consulting Andreu, the director sportif! If you don’t let your team director do his job when you don’t have a clue then you are in for a rude awakening. The hiring of Cipollini was pure marketing genius. But that’s all Ball has for him is his marketing skills. Professional cycling is a results driven sport. Once the headlines fade so will the team unless they get results. It’s great Ball has an active role marketing the team but he has to know where to draw the line between doing good for the team and ruining the chances of success for the team. Michael, I’m fine with the big show you guys put on. It has brought back excitement to the sport and helped bring cycling back into the eyes of America…and the R&R girls are awesome! But I beg you, stop interfering and let the team do the racing. Gary Lee Friday, April 18 Rock Racing rip off #2Thank you Travis for saying what needed to be said! Rock on! JET Tanner Friday, April 18 Advise needed for Alpe D'HuezI and my wife are from Singapore. We plan to be in France from 21 July to 26, then we head to Lucerne. We were thinking of catching the Alpe d'Huez Tour de France stage on July 23, 2008. But honestly, we haven’t a clue as to which hotels to book, how to get there, etc. We're also on a budget. Truth be told, we are going to Lucerne for an educational conference, and I am going on to Montpellier to pick up a puppy dog I have. We figured it would be fantastic if we could catch the Tour during our stay in France. And I have been a great fan of the sport for over 20 years, even raced for my country. So, it would be a dream for us to view the stage. We will appreciate any advice, tips or suggestions. Rajvinder Singh Wednesday, April 23 Stuart O'Grady Team CSC Cervélo R3 ParisDavid, I was taught just the opposite - the trailing spokes go on the outside of the flange because they are the spokes that do the pulling when the wheel is accelerating. I can't say I've ever encountered an issue with properly set up derailleurs and wheels meeting due to spoke lacing and tension under braking. I've also noticed that many machine-built wheels are built the way you describe, and also, most modern high end pre-built wheel sets do away completely with hub flanges and J-bend spokes in favor of some form of straight pull spokes. Odds are the orientation of the pulling/trailing spokes to the hub flange doesn't matter all that much in reality. Eric Schillinger Tuesday, April 22 Recent letters pagesLetters 2008
Letters 2007
|
|
|