Team Cyclingnews.com - Down Under - 2004
June 20, 2004
Drugs in cycling: Entering the debate from the bottom step
By David Harrigan 
This is a subject I would normally rather ignore, preferring to deal with it 
  in my own quiet way. That is until Mr. Bradley McGee, whom I highly admire, 
  made a stand on drugs in cycling and in particular the perception that the majority 
  of the peloton are drug cheats - which I also believe is wrong. On a wet, solo, 
  six-hour ride yesterday, I got to thinking about the whole topic and after many 
  hours of thought, I too feel obligated to defend the sport I love. 
Like many other riders in my position, I have the most to lose from drugs in 
  cycling. I am a full-time, unpaid cyclist that funds my whole career on prizemoney 
  and charity. If you were to believe the current crap been spoon-fed to the media 
  by different parties, then the majority of the peloton is doped. So if we got 
  rid of all the cheats my current ranking of 900th in the world would be around 
  the top 100 and I would be living it up on my six-figure salary. What crap! 
The obvious defence of cycling being the most tested sport in the world doesn't 
  seem to be doing much to ease the public's perception. This is probably because 
  they see cycling as the hardest sport in the world (and it is), and that it 
  takes more dedication and commitment from the body and mind than they find it 
  possible to believe - therefore they assume that you can't do it without drugs. 
  That, however, is what makes cycling so great - to actually understand the amount 
  of physical and mental energy that it takes to win or even compete at the top 
  level. 
The best example of how strong the mind and body can be and how much it can 
  endure is Ironman Triathlon. Go watch some of the 60+ year old male and females 
  complete the grueling 3.8km swim, 180km bike and 42km run. If thousands of people 
  like these around the world can achieve such a difficult test, then why is it 
  such a stretch to believe that a cyclist who has taken years to develop form 
  by training more then 30,000 km a year can ride so strongly over a three-week 
  period (without drugs)? 
I started just racing my bike (after competing in Triathlon) midway through 
  2000. Since then I've developed into a strong rider capable of playing my cards 
  in big races against the best riders in the world. Something I am very proud 
  of. I have had testing done in a lab and I am definitely not a sporting freak. 
  The results were good but not spectacular. At school I only made the regional 
  competition in sports a few times. Through a lot of hard physical training and 
  never giving up when the going got tough, I have been able to transform myself 
  into the athlete I am today. I also get a lot of satisfaction at the look on 
  school friend's faces that haven't seen me for 10 years when I tell them what 
  I do! 
I have made it to this level, and I know with more hard work I will keep moving 
  up and fulfill my dreams of riding with a full professional contract, competing 
  in the biggest races around and racing for my country at the world championships. 
  If I can get to my current level without drugs, and racing on the bare minimum 
  (money and equipment), I can definitely say the majority has to be clean - or 
  if they are on drugs then they are all piss-weak and should have taken up darts 
  instead of cycling. 
Apart from decent physical capabilities you need to have a strong and tough 
  mind - something drug cheats don't have. These cheats can't comprehend doing 
  it the normal way because it's too hard. Boo hoo - that's the reason for the 
  drugs - it's too hard. They are also the ones that presume the rest have got 
  to be on it as well. The reason they tell themselves that it 'has' to be done, 
  'I don't have a choice' etc is that everyone else is on it. These are all thoughts 
  of a weak individual. 
I haven't witnessed anyone take performance enhancing drugs. Even riders you 
  know that have tested positive I have not seen take drugs (but we know that 
  it does go on). So I can't say how many riders use drugs, but neither can confessed 
  drug cheats - have they seen 80 percent of the peloton take drugs? 
Drug cheats are destroying this sport and they have to be found and quietly 
  removed permanently. But the real damage at the moment is that there is a belief 
  that all the best riders are on it and if that becomes everyone's opinion then 
  what's the point! The Tour de France is about to start and everyone should stop 
  giving the weak drug cheats the time of day. Focus on the extraordinary performances 
  from exceptionally well trained athletes that have worked for years to perform 
  at above their best - for this the greatest of cycling races. 
Harro 
 
       
        |