Cyclingnews TV News Tech Features Road MTB BMX Cyclo-cross Track Photos Fitness Letters Search Forum | ||||||||||||||||
|
Letters to Cyclingnews - May 5, 2006
Criticism of UllrichOf course the criticism of Jan Ullrich is harsh, but it's not denigrating what he has achieved (or it shouldn't be); it's disappointment at his incredible talent never being truly spotlighted (since his victory in '97) on the greatest stage cycling possesses - le Tour de France. Every year it's the same. He starts the season underdone - whether through putting on too much weight, illness, suspension or injury - so he pushes ridiculously hard to get fit and/or drop weight, which usually results in his getting ill or injured (again!). Then he starts racing too late so that when the Tour starts he's not on his game until the third week, by which time he's lost way too much time to do anything but aim for a lower podium step. Then, late in the season he wins a Vuelta or an Olympic medal and somewhat redeems his year. But we all know those are consolation prizes and he wants the Tour again most of all. To me, he just seems unable to learn from his own history (it's got to be either bad advice or blockheadedness or both) and adapt whatever he needs to adapt to make sure he doesn't repeat his failure. I honestly hope I'm wrong and he shows us his true measure, but I fear not. I believe he'll be destroyed by all the attacking that is going to happen among the Bassos, Landis', Valverdes and other new generation Tour stars in waiting... Oli Brooke-White Monday, May 1, 2006 The Ullrich-bashing bandwagonUllrich deserves more credit than criticism, but after so many failures at toppling the giant that was Armstrong, people feel betrayed. Ullrich went into every tour as the underdog to Armstrong and people placed their faith in him to remove America from the historically European-dominated race. They cheered him to pinch America awake from its Tour de France dreaming. In that sense, he was a modern day Louison Bobet, providing European cycling with its best chance to save face against longstanding foreign domination. The only thing that purists of the sport liked less than Armstrong winning, was Ullrich losing. He had seven years (six participating years) to stop Armstrong, but now that the American has set his record, the damage can never be undone, and for that Ullrich must suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. Regardless of what comes to pass during this year's Tour, his place is already set in history and in the minds of everyone who has two cents: Ullrich was the one man that couldn't defeat Armstrong. He may be one of the greatest Tour riders of all time, but in regards to the Armstrong era, he is just another ticket on the floor. Stefan Harhay Monday, May 1, 2006 Ullrich in 2006Basso will be absolutely knackered! The Giro 2006 is simply brutal. The problem for Basso is he up against climbers, not rouleurs. Cunego, Simoni, Di Luca, Rujano et al. Basso also hit form too early, indicating his ultimate commitment to Italy. Winning in March is dumb and dysrythmic; high altitude anaerobic attacks are severely debilitating. Basso is no Pantani! The TDF course is pathetic (again)...the Pyrenees are non existent and only the Alps stand up to the power riders and guess what…Ullrich the diesel always hits top form in week three of the Tour. In fact if you analyse his performance: his average week three form would have seen him win more than his one solitary tour. The Tour is by far the toughest Grand Tour in terms of dynamic course design, and therefore can be seen in the attacking behaviour of the riders - last climbs 50KM from the finish, easy gradient power climbs, long boring stages, no early mountains etc. But 2006 has been tailor made for Ullrich, hence Riis's odd gambling with his prize asset. Basso will win neither the Giro nor the Tour. Mark Wills Friday, April 28, 2006 Jan dramasAll of this criticism of Jan is very harsh. "Looking forward to his retirement..." Come on! He is one of the most amiable riders in the peloton, unlike Sir Armstrong. He is the most gifted rider in the peloton since Eddy, as has been mentioned by Armstrong and other former riders. Give the guy a break, he would outride all of us with one leg tied behind his back then feel bad about it. He may lack the cannibalistic sense of Eddy, or the maniacal determination of Armstrong; so what! How many of you can even finish a TdF mountain stage? Glen Baghdasarian Saturday, April 29, 2006 More Jan dramasCalling Jan Ullrich a loser is, regardless of anyone's opinion, nothing short of ridiculous (I self-censored my original word choices). Tour de France, Tour of Switzerland, Tour of Germany, Tour of Spain, World Championship, Olympic Gold medal...every rider in the peloton today, and certainly everyone reading Cyclingnews, would give almost anything to be such a big loser. Rob Found Friday, April 28, 2006 Bruyneel's Giro commentsJohan Bruyneel needs to take his head out of his backside with his comments about the Giro. The Giro is for the people who turn up at the side of the road. Without the spectators the race would be nothing, there would be no sponsors and the professional sport would die. I'm sure I speak for many such spectators when I say that last year's Giro was by far the most exciting race for years. We want massive climbs with summit finishes. We want unpaved roads. We want to be unsure of the outcome until the final day. We want to see the riders using 29 sprockets going up crazy climbs. We want the leader's jersey to change many times. I'm sorry Mr. Bruyneel, but I know how hard it must be not being able to control a race like you have done for the last few years in France. But the public is tired of seeing one team keeping the tempo high and then everything happening in the last 5km of a climb. We want to see attacks two cols from the finish. As the Microsoft commercials say, "Era is over". If the dura ace rear mech can't handle a 29 sprocket, use something else. I'm sure myself and several million other fans can't wait for the Giro to start and can't wait for the last week. Dr Jonathan Roberts Thursday, May 4, 2006 Team helmetsIn relation to Fausto Pastrone's letter about team helmets - it's because of the US safety rule. It requires helmets to pass a different test then they do in Europe. Joe Coddington Friday, April 28, 2006 Volunteering at bike racesMy wife and I volunteered to be one of the neutral support teams for the La Vuelta de Bisbee in Arizona. We live close by, and our local bike shop, M&M Cycling, coordinates neutral support for the race. We supported, along with another team, the women's C event. The organizers, officials, racers, and our partner support team of Brett and Fiona helped and encouraged us from start to finish. We were the inexperienced newbies, but were treated like old Fridayends. We got to see a bike race from the "inside" and witnessed an exciting finish to the final stage up close, since we were assigned to support the breakaway group on the final climb. If you have ever thought about volunteering to help in your local races, we say just do it! Being a part of the event gives you a whole new perspective on bike racing. It was fun and exciting, and we will be back next year. Sandy and Pat O'Brien Thursday, May 4, 2006 Hincapie in Paris-RoubaixI just wanted to point out a distinction between tactics and strategy. Reader Jim Graham mentioned that, with respect to Hincapie's teammates' support at P-R, when he crashed no one waited for him. "Watch the crash; one teammate (sorry, I don't know which one) glanced at Hincapie falling and kept riding, the other got on the radio and kept riding. There was not a split second's hesitation from either of them. " That's racing in the day of radios. When your teammate crashes, even if he's the protected leader, you charge on. Why? Because you have two choices, to stop immediately and to race on. But it's your DS's call, not yours. So if you guess right, you're golden. And if you race on but guess wrong, then it's too easy to slow down or even turn around, and all is still alright. But if you stop to wait but have guessed wrong, then you're screwed and you've just lost the lead group. So, regardless of what the DS will eventually decide, the immediate response is always to charge on, while waiting to hear from your DS on the radio. Steve O'Dell, Saturday, April 29, 2006 Recent letters pagesLetters 2006
|
|
|