TRP CR950 and EuroX cantilevers and RL950 brake levers - capable
stoppers for the mud crowd
The TRP CR950 cantilevers
|
|
There isn't much adjustability
here
|
|
The construction and
design
|
|
The RL950 top-mount
levers
|
|
TRP has quickly moved into the higher-end 'cross brake scene with
its CR950 and EuroX cantilevers, and RL950 top-mount levers. The
CR950 brakes utilize stout solid carbon fiber arms (no aluminum
skeleton here, according to TRP) arranged in a reasonably standard
medium-profile configuration that provides a good balance between
braking power and mud clearance. They're also light at just 152g
per wheel (with pads and titanium mounting hardware), but they don't
sacrifice any adjustability in the process: linear pull-style cartridge
pads offer a full range of tilt, angle, height, and toe-in settings
and each arm sports micro-adjustable return spring tension to dial
in the lever feel and centering position.
The EuroX cantilevers, on the other hand, embody everything that
is both good and bad about this old-school design. They're fantastically
light at just 123g per wheel (with pads and hardware), and TRP offers
even lighter carbon fiber ones that shed another 22g for a full
bike's worth. The high-profile design also delivers heaps of rim
and mud clearance, and TRP's Inplace pad holders fit standard Shimano/SRAM-type
road cartridges for a wider array of compound choices (especially
when using carbon rims). However, as with all brakes of this design,
pad adjustments are limited to just tilt and angle (although toe-in
on the aluminum version can arguably be adjusted by bending the
whole assembly).
The RL950 levers continue the lightweight theme with a milled-out
hinged aluminum clamp (available in 24, 26, and 31.8mm diameters)
and carbon fiber blades for a final weight of just 78g per pair.
We started out on the CR950 cantis, and it quickly became obvious
why pro riders such as Katie
Compton, Tim
Johnson, and Lyne
Bessette go this route. The well-designed arms offer plenty
of power and modulation and are practically flex-free, and the full
accoutrement of adjustments allowed for perfect pad positioning.
As expected, mud clearance on the medium-profile system could have
been a bit better, but it still more than sufficed for all but the
nastiest conditions. We were, however, particularly fond of the
wide range of spring tension adjustment as it provided as light,
or as firm, a pull at the lever as we wanted.
Speaking of levers, the RL950 top-mounts worked like a dream with
well-shaped blades and smooth pull. The integrated aluminum barrel
adjusters came in especially handy as the pads wore. There isn't
much else to say here, but they work as advertised, they're light,
and they look cool so we have no complaints.
Later on in the season we switched to the EuroX arms, and we can
see why this design remains so popular on the race circuit as they
do provide lots of clearance in the event of a muddy event or a
warped wheel. However, that high-profile stance also comes with
a low leverage ratio, meaning that lever feel is extremely firm
but braking power is modest at best. That wasn't helped by the lack
of pad adjustment, either, as we only achieved full pad surface
contact after several weeks of wear (ok, a file would have quickened
things up here). The limited adjustments also made for more difficult
setup and it was virtually impossible to back off the spring tension
from its ultra-stiff default setting.
In the end, our preference was for the more functional CR950's,
which simply delivered better braking performance overall and were
far easier to set up. The EuroX brakes work alright, but in our
opinion, don't offer enough of a weight savings benefit to justify
their use unless you absolutely have to shave every last
gram or perpetually find yourself racing in thick dirt soup.
Price: US$129.99 (CR950 cantilevers, per wheel, with pads,
straddle cable, and carrier); US$109.99 (EuroX aluminum cantilevers,
per wheel, with two sets of pads, straddle cable, and carrier);
US$69.99 (RL950 levers)
Pros: CR950: plenty of power and modulation, light weight, full
range of adjustability; EuroX: ultralight weight and superb value,
tons of mud clearance; RL950: smooth pull, light, well-shaped carbon
blades
Cons: CR950: none; EuroX: limited pad adjustment and high-profile
design made for just adequate stopping performance; RL950: none
Cyclingnews rating: CR950: ;
EuroX: ;
RL950 levers:
More info: www.trpbrakes.com
PhotographyFor a thumbnail gallery of these images, click here
Images by
James Huang/Cyclingnews.com
Light&Motion Stella 180-L - lots of light in a tiny package
The Light&Motion Stella
180-L
|
|
Waterproof connectors
|
|
The handlebar mount
is adjustable
|
|
LED technology has progressed in leaps and bounds over the past
few years. In comparison to HID systems, LED emitters are smaller,
lighter, last longer (lifespan, that is, not necessarily burn time),
and far more shock-resistant. As a result, the vast majority of
high-end lighting systems currently on the market have switched
from HID to LED, and Light&Motion's new Stella 180-L is a perfect
example why.
The Stella 180-L packs just 180 lumens (its ARC HID big brother
churns out up to 675 lumens), but Light&Motion wisely focuses most
of that power into a relatively concentrated beam pattern that effectively
punches through inky darkness. Nevertheless, it isn't quite powerful
enough on its own for really serious trail riding as there isn't
much peripheral illumination and the beam is overridden pretty quickly
as the speeds climb.
However, it's superb as a supplementary helmet-mounted light for
looking around corners, when cresting a rise, or just to peer a
little further ahead than your bar-mounted light. When pressed into
more casual commuter service, it's also more than adequate for illuminating
the path well in front of you or drawing the necessary attention
from absentminded drivers.
When factoring in the Stella 180-L's form factor and weight, though,
it delivers a mighty impressive little package. The finned aluminum
head is about the size of an egg (and we mean a standard medium
egg here, not 'Extra Large') and the accompanying Li-ion battery
is roughly the same girth as a can of Red Bull but only two-thirds
as tall. The entire setup weighs only 288g in helmet-mounted form
or a slightly heavier 334g in a handlebar-mounted configuration
including Light&Motion's tilt- and angle-adjustable bracket. The
five hour burn time on high doesn't hurt, either, nor do its four
total brightness settings or two hour recharge time.
The most serious riders will likely want for more output than what
the Stella 180-L delivers on its own, but for everyone else, it
offers usable power in a wrapper that's lighter and smaller than
most with more than enough burn time to get you through the end
of your ride.
Price: US$299.95
Pros: Good output with an intelligently shaped beam pattern,
exceptionally small and light, tilt- and angle-adjustable helmet
and bar mounts included, long run time, waterproof connections
Cons: Not quite enough power to run on its own for serious
trail riding, concentrated beam pattern doesn't offer much peripheral
illumination
Cyclingnews rating:
More info: www.bikelights.com
PhotographyFor a thumbnail gallery of these images, click here
Images by
James Huang/Cyclingnews.com
Lupine Wilma 6 - Pushing LED technology to HID levels
Lupine's Wilma 6 delivers
almost as much light
|
|
Four LEDs combine for
an impressive
|
|
The charger quickly
replenishes a dead battery
|
|
The battery strap system
|
|
Everything comes packaged
|
|
When we tested the Lupine
Edison 5 HID lighting system last year, one of our comments
was "retina-frying light output" as it was far and away the most
powerful bicycle light we'd come across at the time.
Fast forward to 2007, though, and even Lupine itself has abandoned
HID technology in favor of LED. As compared to that Edison 5, the
new four-LED Wilma 6 pumps out 830 lumens instead of 900 while dropping
about 30g from the slightly more compact finned aluminum head. The
Wilma 6 also burns for four hours instead of three (with an identical
battery), packs the aforementioned durability and longevity benefits
of LED, and the emitters are also upgradeable as technology improves.
Sounds like a slam dunk to us.
Oh… hold up. While the output of the Wilma head closely mirrors
that of the Edison, the relatively even flood pattern is far broader
than the Edison's center-concentrated beam. The Wilma lights up
more of the periphery as a result but it just doesn't reach
as far as the Edison. As a result, we found that we weren't able
to ride as fast or as confidently on the trail with the Wilma as
we could with the Edison, and we weren't able to highlight certain
trail features with the old center-weighted pattern like we used
to.
In the end, we preferred using the Wilma in its bar-mounted configuration
for general trail illumination and supplemented it with a spot-patterned
helmet light (see above). Even then, though, we found a surprisingly
amount of room for improvement. Lupine's o-ring mounting system
works well on standard diameter bars but is a bear to mount on today's
increasingly common oversized pipes (a second o-ring option would
be nice). It's also virtually impossible to adjust the lateral aim
of the lamp if you're mounting it on a section of handlebar that
isn't perfectly perpendicular to dead ahead. In helmet-mounted form,
the high-tech PCS7 controller (i.e. the 'on-off' switch) is also
a bit tricky to anchor on some models.
Our issues carried over to the battery, too. It's small, compact,
and devoid of sharp edges, but the increasing prevalence of oddly-shaped
carbon fiber and hydroformed aluminum frames caused some mounting
headaches with Lupine's strapping system. Finally, the Wilma 6 is
about US$50 cheaper than the Edison (although still US$650!), but
its downgraded charger omits the LCD display and diagnostic capabilities
of the Edison's killer Charger
One version.
Make no mistake, the Wilma is still mega-bright (brighter than
nearly all HID systems on the market, in fact) but the Edison absolutely
spoiled us on what we expect from a premium lighting system. The
Wilma may house cutting-edge LED technology, but we'd like a slightly
more concentrated beam pattern and some of the fittings are in desperate
need of updating for better compatibility with today's equipment.
Price: US$650
Pros: Broad beam pattern illuminates a lot of trail, HID-beating
lumen output, durability and longevity of LED emitters, upgradeable
head, top-notch construction and quality
Cons: Broad beam pattern doesn't reach far enough ahead,
difficult to mount on some popular configurations, can't adjust
beam laterally, downgraded charger
Cyclingnews rating:
More info: www.lupine.de
PhotographyFor a thumbnail gallery of these images, click here
Images by
James Huang/Cyclingnews.com
|