Recently on Cyclingnews.com
|
Mt Hood Classic Photo ©: Swift
|
|
|
Letters to Cyclingnews - July 21, 2006, part 2
Here's your chance to get more involved with Cyclingnews. Comments and
criticism on current stories, races, coverage and anything cycling related
are welcomed, even pictures if you wish. Letters should be brief (less
than 300 words), with the sender clearly identified. They may be edited
for space and clarity; please stick to one topic per letter. We will normally
include your name and place of residence, but not your email address unless
you specify in the message.
Please email your correspondence to letters@cyclingnews.com.
Another bumper letters page. Part
one is here.
Recent letters
Legalising doping
Full transparency
Basso and DNA
Doping, lawyers, and Basso
Ullrich's Innocence
Tyler Hamilton
Did Millar come clean
Ullrich's doping plan
Doping and still suffering
|
|
Legalising doping
There is no such thing anywhere in this world as absolute fairness.
It simply doesn't exist. The closest thing perhaps is socialism
and I'm pretty sure cycling doesn't need to go there. Cycling isn't
absolutely fair and never will be. Some riders will have a natural
edge and other riders will have more money, better doctors, better
massage therapists and stronger teammates. What is important is
that the rules of the sport give everyone a reasonably equal opportunity
to compete. What cyclists do, or are able to do, with their opportunity
and the circumstances of the competition is what makes it worth
watching.
So, since absolute fairness is absurd, it makes a great deal of
sense that legalizing doping in cycling would, at a minimum, create
a level playing field. If there were no rules to limit the methods
by which riders attempt to improve themselves and their performance,
cycling would rid itself of the negative energy of cheating. Instead,
new methods, strategies, doping, might be viewed as the natural
evolution and progress of a sport and its science. A friend of mine,
who at one time was a cyclist in Belgium, believes that every cyclist
in the peloton is doping - every one of them. As a result, he believes
that the playing field is essentially level now. In other words,
the riders who win today have natural abilities that would allow
them to win if no one was doping. If Basso can win the Tour if everyone
is doping, he could also win if nobody was doping.
However, the rules should attempt to protect the "best interests"
of the riders. There are certain drugs and methods which are known
to be very dangerous and I think the rules must protect the cyclists
from these things. However, new methods of training, ideas about
nutrition, supplements (natural or not) should be allowed if they
do not pose a significant quantifiable proven threat to the atheletes
health. If it is not dangerous, it is progress. Progress is evolution.
Evolution is change. Change is new methods and strategies, better
technology, faster speeds and broken records. The media, in general,
and the authorities of sport seem to be opposed to anything new
that might give one participant an edge over the other. Further,
if what an athelete is doing is not explicity against the rules
then it is not cheating, it is progress. If eventually a new method
is determined to be dangerous, then make it against the rules. To
oppose progress is to oppose a fundamental aspect of sport which
is the obligation of any athelete to continually strive to improve
themselves and their performance. The rules should not limit, impede
or prevent improved performance. Records in baseball are meant to
be broken. Quit whining.
As they stand now, the rules against doping in cycling do little
more for the sport than give the losers (generally the French) an
opportunity to whine and bitch and make themselves feel better about
their poor performance or the poor results of their countrymen.
Have you ever noticed that the players never whine and bitch about
other cyclists doping? If I was clean and I thought other cyclists
were doping regularly to give themselves an advantage, I would definitely
be talking about it. Yet, that doesn't happen in cycling.
Cycling needs to abandon the "doping" witch hunt, implement rules
that reasonably protect participants from dangerous drugs or methods
(risk is relative since these guys and gals go down mountains at
50 or 60 mph on bikes) and allow progress to happen and be rewarded.
In the private sector, a guy who designs a more aerodynamic handlebar
is rewarded, but in cycling he's a cheater. That is ridiculous!
Tod Blackwell
USA
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond
to this letter
|
|
Legalising doping
Legalizing or not legalizing doping, that is not the question.
As far as competing goes, the first and foremost rule (often not explicitely
written) is that there is an equal chance for each contender to win.
Car races like Formula 1 or Nascar have lengthy technical rules so that:
- No one gets a too great advantage over the other competitors.
- To ensure a decent competition which will be interesting to follow for the
fans.
Having equal chances of winning, that is the question.
Cycling is trying do the same, control equal chances of winning, but it is
far more difficult to control a human body compared to a mechanical device (being
car, bike, canoe, bobsleigh, etc.).
The only way to ensure the fairness of the competition would be to monitor
each competitor 24 hours per day and control everything which is taken by the
competitors. A nearly impossible task.
As far as I can tell the war against doping will be endless. This war started
quite long ago: the antique Olympic games were actually stopped because of cheating
and doping scandals. If you think that doping will disappear in the near future,
don't hold your breath...
The issue we face is then how do we make sure that the competition is fair.
I think this is a greater issue than permitting or not the use of some substances.
This hurts the sport world, not only cycling, because fans will never know
if it was a well earned victory of not.
And I must admit that my interest for the athlete's feats has diminished a
bit but in rewards I am more than happy with mines (however modest they are)
since I know for sure they are "clean".
Yvan Dionne
Québec City, Canada
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Legalising doping
Did you know that parents routinely allow their kids to take the drugs caffeine
and alcohol (especially after attaining legal age)? My point is that some of
the so called doping practices may not be harmful when done correctly.
Johnny is very confused and is going to make up his own mind regardless of
what his parents say. Or maybe I'm wrong and everybody on Dr. Fuentes' list
had negligent parents.
If there was a way to enforce drug policy effectively, that would be great.
But that does seem likely at the moment, perhaps never.
David Hirsch
Sunday, July 16, 2006
Respond to this
letter
Full transparency
If the UCI, racers and races are truly interested in cleaning up the sport,
why would they not (as a first step) make public the riders' hematocrit values
throughout the race? Publish the initial health check numbers and any subsequent
testing values. These numbers should drop throughout the race, and except for
a few medical exemptions should be below 50 at the start.
John Myrick
Clemmons, NC USA
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Basso and DNA
Basso's lawyer says "DNA testing is traumatic and not 100% reliable." The phrase
is completely ridiculous and alone almost assures me he is guilty (I sincerely
hope I am wrong). I imagine it will be emotionally traumatic waiting for the
results. If I were Basso and I really had nothing to do with this affair, I
would have handed over blood or hair or whatever ASAP for DNA testing to clear
my name. But if I was pretty sure that a bag of my frozen red cells was sitting
on a shelf somewhere, I'd be a little tense. I can't wait to hear the clever
excuses, which I imagine will be just as creative as the OJ Simpson trial.
J. Salmon
Lynchburg, VA
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Respond to this
letter
Doping, lawyers, and Basso
It's always interesting when lawyers get involved in these things.
I like what Basso's lawyer, Martelli, came up with: "A DNA test is traumatic,
and not 100% reliable,..."
Sorry, but "no," and "no." DNA testing is not traumatic, unless you have a
fear of cotton swabs; and with modern techniques and equipment, DNA tests are
(for all practical purposes) 100% reliable. A bag full of blood is more than
enough material for a battery of reliable tests, at multiple labs. If we were
talking of testing proteins from a discarded cigarette butt, then I might be
skeptical of the results, but with a bag full of blood (untainted DNA) and a
fresh swab, a DNA test (or two, or 20) would readily discount Basso's involvement
in doping. Or not.
Cyclists at Basso's level should be held to a higher standard than a common
criminal. That does not mean "presumed innocent until proven guilty," unfortunately.
It means that if credible evidence is found that implicates a cyclist in doping,
then said cyclist must volunteer the precious bodily fluids necessary to determine
the truth.
Maybe we'll find out that Basso only partakes of rainwater, after all is said
and done. Or not.
Jay McBeth
Texas
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Ullrich's Innocence
Mr. Ullrich is complaining that he should be considered innocent until proven
guilty. Well, that might be the standard in a trial, but given the mountain
of evidence against him, it seems that bail would be set at a minimum of $1,000,000
if he were in the United States. First, his ‘doctor’ has admitted to providing
illegal substances in order to ‘protect the health’ of his riders/patients.
Second, searches have uncovered piles of illegal substances, bags of blood and
doping equipment in the possession of his ‘doctor’. Third, his trainer/coach/mentor
is in regular contact with the ‘doctor’ asking for more and admitting that he
was surprised at how well the treatments worked. Someone needs to contact Mr.
Ullrich and tell him that he needs a reality check. Mr. Ullrich needs to respond
in a detailed, systematic, open manner and he needs to do it now if he wants
to retain any credibility. By the way, why does Mr. Ullrich travel all the way
to Spain to see a doctor? Are there really no doctors in Germany qualified to
treat him?
David C. Brayton
Healdsburg, California, USA
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Tyler Hamilton
Glaring inconsistency. The Tyler Hamilton Operation Puerto affair has an interesting
twist. If this evidence is true, it shows that he was doping his own blood.
But if the tests are true which got him his two year suspension, then he doped
blood from another person. It can't be both. Which is it?
Bob Wooldridge
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Did Millar come clean
I believe Miller did name Massimiliano Lelli (and maybe others?) during his
drug case. Most riders who have named other riders involved with drugs seemed
to have then been snubbed by most of the peloton on there return. I believe
a few have quit due to the treatment they received from other riders. I guess
once Tyler started along the – “I am innocent” route to the degree he did it
is difficult to U-turn. Surely he must realize it is beginning to look very
stupid. Though I guess it never did Richard Virenque any harm! What is really
annoying me is the lack of names from other sports. Whilst Dick Pound is saying
Cycling is in the toilet other sports where drugs are probably just as prevalent
remain untainted. All coverage of the Tour in the media has included comments
on the drugs investigation, but when I what the World Cup nothing was mentioned.
It was the same during Wimbledon. Surely these events like the Tour would have
provide the media with the biggest impact by naming names? A spokes person from
the LTA said no Tennis players had failed a drugs test but then neither had
David Miller, so this is no proof that there drugs are not being taken. Are
Football and Tennis rich enough to cover-up any allegations? It certainly seems
something is going on.
Tim Kingston
Ashford, Kent, UK
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond to this
letter
Did Millar come clean
This is a response to all the e-mails stating that David Miller is a good guy
because he came clean about his EPO use. Don't you all remember him calling
his former team mates liars and nutters because they told authorities that he
had doped? Let's face it, he didn't own up to anything until the 2 empty vials
of EPO were found in his house. He lied until irrefutable evidence was found
that proved him guilty. These are not the actions of a "true man".
Mike Tucker
Santa Barbara, CA USA
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond to this
letter
Ullrich's doping plan
As a physician I have to express my disgust at the number of drugs planned
for Jan. In medicine you should have controlled clinical trials to test the
safety and effectiveness of a therapeutic regimen. Where is the data that all
of these drugs administered to Jan are safe, and without a placebo-controlled
trial how do we know that his improved performance is not just a placebo effect
(you would be surprised at the power of a placebo)? I have patients who have
developed avascular necrosis of the hip with a single course of corticosteroids
given for legitimate medical needs. This kind of experimentation on athletes
is just wrong. But do not blame just the athletes, the physicians involved are
far far worse and should lose their license. Do no harm!!
Thomas Sharpton
Livermore, Ca
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Doping and still suffering
From what I have read, most of the doping involved in the Puerto affair has
to do with recovering from the hard efforts that Tour de France riders put in
day after day. It seems that this may be the price that fans have to pay to
enjoy watching the top echelon of the sport engage in such super human battles
over a three week tour. I would prefer un-assisted competition, but if the requirements
of the sport demand more than the human body can endure, then I don't think
that we should be surprised if the participants look to chemicals to help them
through.
Also, the EPO or hormones or whatever do not turn the pedals for the riders.
It may help them go a bit faster, but I still see a hell of a lot of suffering
on the road. I think all cyclist know that you will push your pain tolerance
to its limit, so I still admire Ullrich and Basso and the others for the suffering
they have put in on the road and the sacrifices they have made in the name of
winning the Tour de France.
Maybe the tour organizers and the medical experts should get together and determine
what he human body can do, and recover from, over a three week period and give
the riders a break from the Herculean demands that are being placed on them.
Bradley Steere
USA
Friday, July 14, 2006
Respond
to this letter
Recent letters pages
Letters 2006
- July 14, part 2: Landis' aero
bars, Wide Open Before the Cols- An Average Fan's Predictions, US Nationals,
Cipo @ the Tour, And the Winner is?, Boring spots, Disco Boys?, Enough Lance,
Is Discovery really a true U.S. Pro Tour Team?, Kloden by default, Millar's
new TT position, Photogenically Challenged Champions, Segregation is not the
solution
- July 14, part 1: Legalising
doping , Small world, Hamilton's fax, Cheats, Come clean, Simoni, Doping and
the double standard, Dopers don't affect love of riding, Greg LeMond, Vino,
Lance & LeMond
- July 7, part 2: Legalise it!,
Doping, Greg LeMond, Plenty of riders don't dope, What I will do, Phonak,
Come clean, Hide & Seek, The Early Signs coming True, Doping and sponsors,
Santiago Botero not on the list, An alternative
- July 7, part 1: Are we paying
these guys enough? Cardiac hypertrophy and sudden death, A cycling scandal?
A sad day for cycling fans, Discovery's team leader, Easier racing won't help,
Simoni, Cheats, Vinokourov, An open letter to Ivan Basso, Are we alone?, Sharing
the road, Searching for an old book
- June 30, part 1: Easier racing
won't help, Communidad Valencia and the ASO, Doping & fans, What a Shame,
Sunny side of pro dopers, Tyler Hamilton: how long can he deny, The new "performance"
enhancer, Greg LeMond, Armstrong's letter to IOC, Armstrong, L'Équipe, WADA
& Pound, A call for one more test
- June 30, part 2: Ullrich and
the Tour, Mancebo: The Unsung Hero, Hincapie to lead Disco, Jane Higdon, USA
junior development, Voigt vs. Hincapie, Operation Puerto, Where there is smoke,
there is fire, Watching the wheels come off, Why only cycling?, UCI request
for riders to submit signed statements, UCI leadership questioned by reporters
- June 23: "Next!", Hincapie
to lead Disco, USA junior development, Jane Higdon, A call for one more test,
Armstrong's letter to IOC, Defending Landis, Doping, The Armstrong/L'Équipe/WADA/Pound
affair, Spanish doping allegations, Team consequences, Voigt vs. Hincapie
- June 16: Pound should resign,
Now I’m really confused, Vinokourov, Saiz, doping and the TdF, The Spanish
operation, Misplaced sympathy, Name the suspects, Spanish doping, Opinions
from France, ASO, Simoni vs. Basso, Voigt vs. Hincapie, Jens Voigt vs. George
Hincapie, Voigt and Hincapie, Jane Higdon, Jeremy Vennell diary
- June 11: Simoni vs. Basso,
Basso and Simoni, Simoni versus Basso, Simoni's smile, Sour grapes Simoni,
Sarcastic, disgruntled fan?, Congrats to Jan, Non-round rings, Sport, Voigt
and Hincapie, Jens Voigt, Three cheers for Jens Voigt, Jens Voigt vs. George
Hincapie, Voigt vs. Hincapie, Thanks to Voigt and Manzano, Champion in countless
ways, Chapeau Jens!
- June 9 - Special edition:
Vino’s position, Astana-Wurth and the TdF, Vinokourov, Saiz, doping and the
TdF, Spanish doping allegations, WADA, Vrijman's findings, That Report, WADA
and Armstrong, WADA vs. UCI vs. the riders, WADA's double standard, WADA and
Pound missing the point, Pound should resign, A Pound of what?, The role of
the AIGCP, The Spanish operation, Botero interview, Say it isn't so, Manolo
- June 2: Simoni versus Basso,
Simoni and Basso, Simoni, Simoni's smile, Simoni is a crybaby, Basso and Simoni,
Sour grapes Simoni, Gibo Si-MOAN-i, Blood, drugs, cash and corruption, Sickening
double standard, Spanish federations' reaction to Saiz, Don't be surprised
by drug use, Giro d'Italia, Thanks to Voigt and Manzano, Chapeau Jens!, Jens
Voigt, Three cheers for Jens Voigt, Jens Voigt is the man, Voigt 2006 vs Boogerd
1999, Voigt and Hincapie, Discovery’s Giro team, Altitude tents and EPO, Not
just name-calling, Say it isn't so, Manolo, Spanish doping allegations, Armstrong
and L'Equipe, CSC is a class act, Basso and CSC, Jimenez memories, Markers
in drugs, Discovery Channel's Giro performance, Pound should resign, Giro
live reporting, Banning of altitude tents, Bettini is consistent
- May 26: Their A-game's at home,
The Tour and the TT, Jan's good form, Jan bashing, Congrats to Jan, The diesel,
Double or nothing, Ivance Bassostrong, Bravo, Basso!, Discovery Channel's
Giro performance, Bettini is consistent, Banning of altitude tents, When disqualification
isn't enough, WADA should ban intervals
- May 26 - Special edition:
Say it ain't so, Manolo, Say it isn't so, Spanish Federations' reaction to
Saiz, The doping scandal to end them all
- May 19: Bettini is consistent,
Banning of altitude tents, Hypoxic tents, WADA and altitude tents, Latest
WADA crusade, WADA bans another, Congrats to Jan, Criticism of Jan Ullrich,
Jan bashing, Jan ready for the Tour, Jan's good form, Armstrong - the New
American Idol, The same old Lance, Defeatism in Discovery, Giro reactions,
One of Savoldelli's secrets, Rasmussen's time trial position, Riders under
helmets, Difference between following and leading, The Tour and the TT, Bruyneel's
Giro comments, When disqualification isn't enough
- May 12: Marion Clignet, Bruyneel's
Giro comments, Criticism of Jan Ullrich, Jan bashing, Jan's weight, Defeatism
in Discovery, Lance talking up Basso, The same old Lance, Rasmussen's time
trial position, Giro team time trial, Hincapie in Paris-Roubaix, Riders under
helmets
- May 5: Criticism of Jan, Criticism
of Ullrich, The Ullrich-bashing bandwagon, Ullrich in 2006, Jan dramas, More
Jan dramas, Bruyneel's Giro comments, Team helmets, Volunteering at bike races,
Hincapie in Paris-Roubaix
- April 28: Working for the team
in Georgia, Ullrich's thick skin, Ullrich and the 2006 Tour, Jan Ullrich racing,
Ullrich and THAT wheel, Jan Ullrich, Jan dramas, Paris-Roubaix technology,
Hincapie in Paris-Roubaix, Paris-Roubaix controversy, Paris-Roubaix comments,
Paris-Roubaix tech, Team helmets
- April 21: Paris-Roubaix final
say, Paris-Roubaix controversy, Paris-Roubaix and technology, George and the
fork issue, Quotable quotes, Cycling technology, Behaving like a champion,
Paris-Roubaix: UCI Code of Ethics
- April 14: Continuing to behave
like a champion, No curse of the rainbow jersey, Tom Boonen, Hang in there,
Saul, The gods of cycling, Trek and Paris-Roubaix, Looking out for George,
Paris-Roubaix and technology, Broken forks and broken dreams, Jan Ullrich,
Jan dramas, Disqualifications, So you know, Paris - Roubaix, THAT railway
crossing incident, Need for consistency, Paris-Roubaix - poor Cancellara,
Paris Roubaix disqualification, Paris-Roubaix: setting a good example, Roubaix
disqualification decision, UCI Roubaix disgrace, Paris Roubaix disqualification,
Paris Roubaix affair, Paris-Roubaix fiasco, Paris-Roubaix sham, Racing's railroad
crossings, George's bike failure, Let them race, Roubaix controversy
- April 12 (Special Paris Roubaix
edition): Paris-Roubaix disqualification, Disqualification on the pave, Level
crossing in Paris-Roubaix, Rules are rules, Paris-Roubaix, McQuaid's reasoning,
Pat McQuaid and train barriers, Railway crossing at Paris-Roubaix, Disqualifications
in Paris-Roubaix, Paris-Roubaix crossing, Roubaix controversy, Grade crossings,
Railroad crossings, Safety at Paris-Roubaix, Paris-Roubaix sham, Paris-Roubaix
safety, Paris-Roubaix rail crossing, Boonen and friends cross the tracks,
McQuaid's explanation, Roubaix disqualification decision
- April 7: Hang in there Saul,
De Ronde parcours, Edwig van Hooydonk, Discovery’s American riders, Tom Boonen,
April fools, Hair care product line, Brave new world, Commonwealth Games time
trial, Photo of the year
The complete Cyclingnews letters archive
|
|