Cyclingnews TV   News  Tech   Features   Road   MTB   BMX   Cyclo-cross   Track    Photos    Fitness    Letters   Search   Forum  

Recently on

Giro finale
Photo ©: Bettini

Letters to Cyclingnews - November 11, 2005

Here's your chance to get more involved with Cyclingnews. Comments and criticism on current stories, races, coverage and anything cycling related are welcomed, even pictures if you wish. Letters should be brief (less than 300 words), with the sender clearly identified. They may be edited for space and clarity; please stick to one topic per letter. We will normally include your name and place of residence, but not your email address unless you specify in the message.

Each week's best letter gets our 'letter of the week'. We look for for letters that contain strong, well-presented opinions; humour; useful information or unusual levels of sheer helpfulness.

Please email your correspondence to

Recent letters

LeBlanc's Tour snub of Armstrong
Exciting again
Le Tour will live on without Armstrong
Armstrong, the TdF, etc
The 2006 Tour de France and Lance
Lance, Le Tour and Ethics
Armstrong snub at Tour presentation
Pro wrestling and cycling
Swimming and Cycling
What TdF?
Fair justice
Another doping letter
Where has common sense gone?
Technology in cycling


LeBlanc's Tour snub of Armstrong

This is regarding Endre Barat's letter.

Having been a competitive and at times an elite cyclist for 14 years I know that I love and compete in a sport that doesn't have a clean past and is not entirely clean now. However, I have also raced against enough great cyclists who are now top pros e.g. Ivan Basso and Cadel Evans to know that sometimes that "magic mix" is as simple as a tonne of talent, mental drive, and years of HARD training. I find it hard to believe that so many people follow cycling and say they love it, but they also have no problem bagging riders by calling them all druggies and assuming everyone is on "it". I just don't understand how anyone could follow such a tough passionate sport if at they end of the day they don't believe in the miracle that is a highly trained human body.

In answer to the question Endre asked: "Now that Armstrong has stepped down there's no need to honour any silent agreement - instead it's time to be honest. And really, after Festina do we really believe in miracles?" Um...yes. I can list many examples, and Lance has to obviously be number one, but also the Athens Olympics, where Sarah Ulmer smashed the 3000m individual pursuit world record by six seconds! Sarah was incredibly focused, ultra talented, trained ridiculously hard, and was supported by a core group of people. All these ingredients added up to that amazing ride.

She is as clean as they come, and it had taken her since being a Junior World Champion in 1994 to finally nail that pursuit at senior level. When comparing previous records, and the rate they fall there is no way that six seconds should be smashed off a record in one year. I know that Sarah and Lance are different cyclists so you can't ultimately compare, but Sarah's ride is an example of a cycling miracle, albeit an incredibly hard earned miracle, but a miracle all the way.

Therefore, I am proud to say that miracles do happen. Clean riders win. If you still have doubts maybe you should take Brad McGee up on his offer he had to the press one year to spend a month training with him, see how hard he has to train, and then realise that "magic mix" isn't produced in a lab but riding in the middle of nowhere seven hours a day again and again.

Maybe some people will never believe that a natural human can produce some of the efforts that cyclists do, and like Lance said on the podium at is sad. Ultimately it makes me wonder how you can support a sport and to a degree life without hope. I don't think the more needs more L'Equipes.

Jon-Paul Hendriksen

New Zealand
Saturday, November 5, 2005

Respond to this letter

LeBlanc's Tour snub of Armstrong #2

I was disappointed and amused at the same time to read Mr Barat's letter regarding a "silent agreement" among Lance Armstrong, the UCI and the ASO. Cycling fans who root against Lance Armstrong probably want so badly for him to fall on his face so they can be the ones who say, "I told you so."

Unfortunately for them, this will never happen. You will all have to accept the fact that Lance Armstrong was the best stage racer of his generation. He did it with one in a billion natural ability, incredibly hard work and dedication to winning one race and, of course, a fantastic team. He was a professional triathlete at 16, United States national triathlon champion at 18, World Road Racing Champion at 21.

All unlikely accomplishments. So why is it so shocking that he won the Tour de France seven times? His pedigree says he could do it and he did! With that said, Lance is not bigger then cycling, the same way Michael Jordan is not bigger then basketball or Tiger Woods in golf. The sport of cycling will continue and thrive. Let's allow Lance to go into retirement remembered as he should be - a great champion - and let's go forward enjoying the great sport of cycling.

Hector M Roman

New York City
Wednesday, November 9, 2005

Respond to this letter

Exciting again

Listen up! Quit wasting your breath on Lance this and Lance that. Look on the bright side, pro cycling can be EXCITING AGAIN with Lance out of the picture! Lance was a good (however boring) "Tour" rider and that is about it. Forget the talk, take off your livestrong bracelets, and sit back and watch the 2006 Tour de France with new found enthusiasm again.

R Wits

New Franklin, Ohio
Friday, November 4, 2005

Respond to this letter

Le Tour will live on without Armstrong

It was inevitable that the desire of the TDF organisers to look forward to a new 'post-Lance' era would be seen by some as being motivated by personal spite. However, in order to judge their actions fairly the wider content must be considered. Cycle racing captures the imagination best when adventure and daring play a central part and where the final outcome is uncertain. In France this year I was often unable to find a bar showing live coverage of the Tour, something I would not have believed possible 20 years ago and surely a reflection of how many remained unmoved by the prospect of another calculated, mechanical win by Armstrong and his team.

Yes, a French rider has not won the Tour since 1985 but concern about this cannot be written off as simple chauvinism. French cycling is in need of rejuvenation and seeing home riders challenging for the overall lead would give a much needed boost to French cycling at all levels. Until this happens French cycling will probably continue to stagnate.

Armstrong's dominance has tempered the traditional French passion for 'le Tour' and even 'le velo' in other ways too. His occasional displays of contempt for the French press and even public (such as the claim that he was considering riding the 2006 Tour because "I'm thinking it's the best way to piss [the French] off") were hardly going to see legions of French cycling fans tuning in to see him win their great race.

It is also not long since the Bush Administration threatened that France would be 'made to pay' for its failure to support the invasion of Iraq, French fries were renamed 'freedom fries' and American websites promoted merchandise printed with anti-French hate slogans. Given this it is not surprising that some did not appreciate seeing the roads of France daubed with American Flags and not only an American but a personal friend of Bush repeatedly win their great race. Similarly (and especially so soon after the American torture scandals) the flag-draped nationalism of many Americans who visited the 2005 Tour hoping to see Armstrong 'kick some ass' demonstrated a rather crass lack of awareness of (or perhaps sympathy for) the concern many feel about America's desire for not only sporting but political, military and cultural domination.

Armstrong himself has at times demonstrated a 'gangster' mentality which has hardly encouraged people to warm to him and his victories, nor to believe that he is truly committed to seeing the problem of drug use addressed. Consider the way he gave Simeoni that infamous 'zip the lips' gesture and forced him to drop back to the bunch after Simeoni spoke up about Ferrari's promotion of EPO. (Actions which William Fotheringham said showed Armstrong to have 'all the diplomatic skills of a playground bully'). Similarly Armstrong reportedly pressurised Christopher Bassons not to speak out on drug taking, telling him that if he 'couldn't stand the heat he should stay out of the kitchen' and following him around during stages of the Tour in an attempt to intimidate him into not 'spitting in the soup'.

Armstrong was undeniably a great athlete. However, the Tour will live on without him and perhaps will be the better for it. The 2005 Giro shows just how inspiring an 'Armstrong free' grand tour can be.

Howard Peel

Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Respond to this letter

Armstrong, the TdF, etc

Am I the only who raises a big yawn and a huge ho-hum over all this silliness?

The race above all that I dream of winning as I'm pounding about on my ride is Paris-Roubaix. No one since Hinault has won both the TdF and the Queen of the Classics…until that happens, they're just a bunch of ponces in my book. I await the rider that has the "desire" to tackle them both.

J. Borg

Toronto, ON, Canada.
Friday, November 4, 2005

Respond to this letter

The 2006 Tour de France and Lance

In last week's letters there was the statement, "I'm part-French. Does that make me a cowardly hater of American greatness?"

Your implication is that if you support Armstrong or if you're critical of LeBlanc's presentation, you're anti-French. Obviously you want to concentrate on the knee-jerk reactions of some people in the United States and paint with a rather broad brush. Surprisingly, objectivity and intelligence is alive and flourishing in more places than the ego-driven recesses of Mr Rosnay's mind. I have yet to run into anyone with a brain who would say that the drunk, spitting, foul-mouthed brethren on Alpe D'Huez in '04 were indicative of all Europeans and by "extension" their descendants, neighbours and countrymen.

History re-writes are always interesting. "They" (I'm not sure who "they" is) weren't "pissed off at Indurain", Mr Rosnay writes. Hmmm, I recall reading quite a few articles about how he was making the Tour boring and that Indurain riding the Tour wasn't necessarily good for the race. One would expect that this type of criticism would have ramped up in lieu of a sixth and seventh victory.

Childish would be a good way to describe this whole affair between LeBlanc/L'Equipe and Armstrong. Quite frankly, it probably would have been more elegant to tip your hat and move on rather than to create grounds for a pissing match. Both sides appear (to me) as playground bullies who always seem to smile in front of the right teachers, and get their homework in on time. I for one can't help but think that the duplicity is rather disgusting on both parts. I wonder if Le Tour didn't look the other way as a saviour was pulling them out of the dregs. To wash your hands of your part is rather disingenuous.

These past seven years remind me of Joe Kennedy taking illegal bootleg money with the mafia to build his financial empire, using that same money to get his son elected President and other son appointed Attorney General, then turning the AG lose on indicting the Mob.

I'll let the analogy stand.

Todd Olson
Saturday, November 5, 2005

Respond to this letter

The 2006 Tour de France and Lance #2

Some comments on the Emile de Rosnay letter from nov.4;

First of all, I'm not an American.

Anyway, your attempts to explain that the French are NOT jealous of Armstrong are not based on facts. The fact are that when Armstrong was "flying" up the mountains of the Alps and the Pyrenees a lot of French people haunted Armstrong with comments about doping and sometimes even spitting and threatening to kill him. Then when the French hero Virenque came up the same mountains all the French were ecstatic and screaming for their (previously doping-banned) hero.

And to further strengthen that opinion, now the French are accusing Armstrong for something they can't prove. And to accuse people when you know the evidence will not prove anything (according to L'Equipe itself); how pathetic is that?

Anton Berg,

Monday, November 7, 2005

Respond to this letter

The 2006 Tour de France and Lance #3

The French and the Americans, those two great nations of xenophobes, duke it out over who can be the least gracious. What fun.

The problem for ASO is that Armstrong has made Le Tour vastly more popular, not just in the Anglophone world but also in Asia. But the need to cater to all these outside influences detracts from the 'Frenchness' of the race. It's even worse with no Jalabert senior or Virenque because there's no Frenchman who can get close to the front of the race.

So ASO tries to pretend its not really about winning, money or business, but about indefinable French qualities of fair play (are you listening Virenque?), culture and passion that us mere foreigners can only damage.

But before Americans start to snigger, I seem to remember the same thing happening there. America is the country that invented mountain biking, but when all those Euro guys started cleaning up in the 90's suddenly mountain biking was all about cool, and lifestyle, and Shaun Palmer, who never won much internationally, was the "greatest natural athlete on the planet" - which presumably means the best athlete who never wins much.

Every year France stages the best race in the world over some of the best and most beautiful terrain. Every year it is dominated by cyclists not from France. Last year there were three Americans in the top ten and five in the top twenty. These are all achievements to celebrate and marvel at, so let's do that and drop the petulance and name calling.

In the long term, I think that the French can have the advantage in cycling, if they want it. I don't think that the Americans will never stage a race to compete with Le Tour, but if France pulls its head out of the sand and starts to train its young riders the way that the Americans and Australians train, then a Frenchman can win the tour again.

Iain Thorpe

Wellington, New Zealand
Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Respond to this letter

Lance, Le Tour and Ethics

What I find ironic in the whole Lance/EPO/L'Equipe circus is the hypocrisy. The French journalists wanted to nail Armstrong for cheating. So how did they do it? They cheated.

They lied in order to get results for Lance that showed he wasn't using one drug so they could figure out what is anonymous "number" was. Then they could turn around and use that number to check for EPO. They cheated to supposedly expose a cheater. They lied, subverted and tricked people on their moral crusade. What does that make them? Even if they're right, they dirty their own profession in the process. That's sad. Journalists who will also use any means, cut any corner, twist any rule to get their story. They are guilty of the very transgressions that accuse Armstrong of. These are the journalists who always talk about right and wrong, ethics and morality.

I'm a huge Armstrong fan but it wouldn't surprise me to learn he used EPO. My feeling is, if every cyclist used EPO, lance wins seven. If they're all clean, Lance wins seven. He's simply more gifted, obsessed and confident than the rest. Yes, I'm disappointed but you have to look at the bigger picture of the man and his accomplishments. He's raised more money for a good cause than any athlete on the planet. He's given more hope to people with life threatening diseases than any doctor or miracle drug. He's brought more attention to the sport of cycling than anyone in recent history. For many, many people all over the world he's one of the few truly inspirational heroes.

So what, after the fact, when all the tours are over, does someone accomplish to tear down such a man, to undo all that good? I am also a deep fan of France, I love the country, I studied the language, but this expose strikes me as ugly, mean spirited and petty. Who really benefits at this point? A few dishonest and sleazy writers bent on building their careers by any means neccessary. They would accuse Lance of cheating in cycling the way they have cheated in journalism.

And shame on LeBlanc for profiting so handsomely from Lance's story then discarding him so quickly. If you believe the man is guilty, at least show some class. Unless you're prepared to collect all the extra money that Lance brought to the Tour the last seven years and donate it to charity and just move on and keep your mouth shut.

Matt Walsh

Fairfax, California
Monday, November 7, 2005

Respond to this letter

Armstrong snub at Tour presentation

In October 2004 I was fortunate to attend the presentation of the 2005 Tour in Paris. A big deal was made of former doper Richard Virenque and his record number of King of the Mountains wins. LeBlanc presented him with a big collage highlighting his career. What a difference in his attitude a year later.

Jim Miller

Long Valley, New Jersey, USA
Wednesday, November 9, 2005

Respond to this letter

Pro wrestling and cycling

I've always thought the sport/entertainment phenomena of the WWF, now WWE, with its loud characters, outrageous storylines, and colourful costumes, was unique to North America. Well, in Europe there's the drama of pro cycling. Let us look at the parallels:

1. Hateful all-American (Kurt Angle: Lance Armstrong)
2. Awesome foreign "heels" (the Oriental Express: Team Motorola)
3. Turf war for TV audience (WCW/WWF: Pro Tour/Grand Tours)
4. Old school drill sergeant (sgt slaughter/Bjarne Riis)
5. Rampant drug use (you name it: you name it)
6. Universally hated/loved superstar who revived the sport (Hulk Hogan/Lance Armstrong)
7. Unabashedly partisan commish (Vince McMahon/ JM LeBlanc)

I'm sure all you Americans who grew up watching rasslin' can add more. I watched wrestling into my teens, but the breaking point came when the commissioner (and owner)of the WWF Vince McMahon ate a box of steroids, got into the ring himself against the then champion of the WWF (whom he had beef with) and won. Man, I thought that was one unclassy, self-aggrandizing move. I hope LeBlanc wont pull a Vince McMahon; try to back up his big talk by swallowing a box of EPO and winning the next 7 tours...I might stop watching cycling.

Victor Ching

Toronto, Canada
Friday, November 4, 2005

Respond to this letter

Swimming and Cycling

This is the first that I've heard on this subject of even MORE events for swimming…

I read an article from Chris Hoy recently which represents all of the fellow Kilo riders' thoughts (It can't be possible, be we can't afford to dwell on it, was the sum of it. We just need to focus on other events to continue our desire to succeed). This is totally true and the only approach.

However, how can we not be enticed to dwell on it some what when one hears of such news?

How many events do swimming need? Imagine if for every distance of cycling you had an option to ride it forward, backward, one legged, no hands, or with a few of your mates. Cycling is one of only four sports that began in the modern Olympics. The 1km was indeed part of this programme, as it has been ever since. The 1km is a glue that combines all other disciplines of cycling together as a family.

2005 is such a shameful year for track cycling, to see it turn its back on such a wonderful history. I might buy a swim suit; there's got to be something I can win. Not enough said on this topic.

In cycling,

Ben Kersten
Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Respond to this letter

What TdF?

Bravo; my sentiments exactly. Anyone who followed the Giro this year had to admit that it had just as much sport, drama and meaning as the Tour, maybe more. Whatever made the TdF arbitrarily the 'big one' can just as easily be reversed. Belgian and Italian cycling see to have eclipsed French, and with even the Americans dominating, it is easy to see that the French have their noses out of joint. Tant pis.

Let's just say 'non' and petition Johan and Discovery to target the Giro with lots of coverage. Time for the world to wake up to the fact that there is more than one stage race to follow - TdF brass may have just done us all a favour.

John Park,

Summerland, B.C, Canada
Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Respond to this letter

Fair justice

First of all let me make clear that I am just a spectator and a fan and I am lacking inside detailed knowledge of facts.

Looking back at anti-doping in cycling, I get the impression that not much has improved. Testing has become more organised (or at least pretends to be), but technology on the doping side has become more sophisticated too.

It seems to me that the only result is inequality of treatment among the riders. Some are punished very harshly, with immediate effect, some get away with condoned sentences, some are thrown in jail immediately, and others don't go to jail ever. Some are expelled from the race even if it is the last stage, some get to complete it first. I am sure some of that depends on the fact that every country has slightly different rules (or even the UCI, USADA, or WADA, it looks like if I have to get busted I'd rather do that in Spain than in Italy or France, and maybe I ought to get my racing licence in Schmurfdjikistan or the Confederate states of Polymeria (no don't check your atlas), rather than Italy, Switzerland, USA or France. If these guys are all racing together, why is a substance illegal in Italy, but not in France or vice versa?

The career of a professional cyclist seems to be hanging from regulations and legal technicalities more than I wish. Personally I liked much better the approach of the '70s when somebody testing positive at the Tour or at the Giro was given a time penalty on GC, was retrocessed to the last place, or expelled from the race. Was it not a severe enough punishment to deter from doping, maybe not, but if it is true that the tests are accurate, today's policies aren't doing the job either. On the other hand if the tests are not 100% accurate (I'll settle for 99.9%) then they shouldn't cost somebody's career. Have some respect for these guys: they have been sacrificing a lot and working harder than in a sweat shop since the age of 10 or 12. Punish them but don't terminate their careers to make an example. If a reason to be harsh on them is the fact that there is prize and sponsor money involved and cheating needs to be prevented and prosecuted, then I would pay more attention to sports where the real money is (not tough to figure out: NFL/MLB/NBA in the US and Canada, soccer everywhere else), unless the fact that there is more money is the reason why they don't get bugged as much.

Stefano Drei

Californian Central Coast
(really looking forward to the Tour of California stopping in San Luis Obispo!)

Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Respond to this letter

Another doping letter

Heras's case aside, when is the UCI , if ever, going to also start punishing team doctors, directors, managers, soigneurs, mechanics and even sponsors that enable, promote and/or directly contribute to drug use? The end users are the only ones that are currently punished and yet there are clearly not the only ones who SHOULD be punished. The UCI should develop its own internal department to investigate and hand out punishments to those caught contributing to the doping problem. The exact nature of the punishment isn't for me to determine. But the bottom line is the problem of doping in cycling, real or perceived, will not die down as long as there are directors working in the sport that used to have the nickname "Mr 60%" not too long ago.

The flip-side of the coin is that some riders are clearly getting screwed by laboratories and news organizations that release test data before the "B" sample is tested and the GOVERNING BODY authorizes the release of the information to the public. The punishment should be simple: if a lab leaks or releases the name of an athlete even once before the B sample is tested, said lab should lose their WADA, IOC and/or UCI accreditation for two years. Second violation? Permanent loss of testing privileges. As far as newspapers go, I guess you can't punish them...unless they are financially-tied to an organization that promotes cycling races!

Spencer Dech

Lansdale, PA, USA
Wednesday, November 9, 2005

Respond to this letter

Where has common sense gone?

There are two recent high profile cases of doping that I am confused about. Tyler Hamilton and Roberto Heras.

If Tyler is innocent of doping then I would have thought that the reason that he would have been caught by a false positive test would be an ongoing problem. If this is the case then a simple out of competition test, when you know that he has not blood doped to walk down to the corner shop, should show the same result. If he fails it again we have an issue with the testing process. If he passes then there is something about his body at the time after an extreme effort that means he failed. Whether this is blood doping from another source, which strikes me as an extremely dangerous way to blood dope when you could just take your own blood to do this, or the body under stress has a different reaction will require further investigation. Is this just plain common sense gone missing or have I missed the boat on this one?

As for Roberto Heras, I would like to know how long it takes for EPO to have an affect. Excuse my medical ignorance but if you take EPO I doubt it has an immediate effect like a stimulant would. If Roberto was on EPO then he probably would have had to have been on a course of the stuff and he would have failed all of the previous tests that were done on him during La Vuelta. He was leading this and he had won a few other stages before stage 20 so I imagine that he had been that he had a few tests done. Therefore his window of opportunity would have been very small to take EPO and to get a change in his performance while in an environment where he knows he is going to be tested at any possible moment. Mid tour doping strikes me as a very stupid thing to do because if it does have an affect then you know that this is going to show up when you go through doping control the very next day. The same applies to Tyler as well.

Unfortunately the doping rules seem to say if you fail a doping test in a laboratory then you are going to be suspended. There is no check in the process to stop and have a think about ways that prove or disprove the test that are not medically based. If the person who has failed the test has been consistently tested in the days prior to the event and they have passed the test and then they fail the test with a marginal reading then it is possible that they have taken drugs to lift their haemocrit levels to just below the legal limit but it is not probable as they would now that they are going to fail a test when they took these drugs.

Drugs are not taken for one day to get a result. The athletes know that what they are going to do is detectable for a long period of time and there does not seem to be any logic in taking something to win a day in a three week event as you know that you are going to be tested and caught before the drugs have had a chance to leave your system.

Where does common sense fall in all of this? It's certainly the letter of the law that if you fail a test then you should be suspended. But it is not the spirit of the law that says that the tests are infallible and if everything else says that if there was no good reason to take the drugs, there was probably no benefit in taking the drugs and you have more to lose in terms of sponsorship and credibility than to be gained by one good performance then chances are that you are innocent regardless of whatever the marginal reading out of a lab has said.

Brett Rallings
Thursday, November 10, 2005

Respond to this letter

Technology in cycling

Awesome news about Campagnolo's foray into electronic shifting; what's next, the drivetrain? With a sensor on the crank and a motor on the rear hub and we won't need any more of those fiddly chain things. You can see some pro team directors chafing at the bit to get hold of the electronic derailleurs. Not only can they yell at the racers over the radio, but with a bit of fiddling and the right radio frequency they'll be able to select the gearing for them. With a visit to the local pet store and a couple of remote control shock collars on each rider the team directors will have absolute control. Giddyup!

A couple of people have been murmuring about the Tour, and an apparent snub by the French (shock). To truly honour Mr Armstrong he should have had one of those Garmin GPS units fitted to his bike in last year's tour. Every tour from now on can then be run over the same course and the riders can race against a little Lance icon on the screen, while avoiding the circus like antics of the Rasmussen icon on the final time trial.

What I'm really waiting for though is cloning. A team of Lance Armstrong's against a team of Eddy Merckxs. Awesome. And a clone of me going to work so I can stay home and watch. The winner would clearly be…

Nick Hardy

Boise, Idaho, USA
Saturday, November 5, 2005

Respond to this letter


I read with interest the plug for the man's book and the related discussion of the extremes of the 'longest mountain bike route'. What is the exact route and where is it identified?

There is a route, established by Adventure Cycling and known as The Great Divide Mountain Bike Trail that finishes in New Mexico and does not enter Arizona, as it stays loyal to the Continental Divide. This route goes from the New Mexico/Mexico border to Banff, Alberta, Canada and has been mapped for a few years (the first section in 1996, I believe). I have been along the entire route, as have many others, and while I didn't consider it an intrepid or risky undertaking found it to be absolutely rewarding in so many ways.

T Ritter

Bellingham, WA
Thursday, November 10, 2005 5:26 PM

Respond to this letter

Recent letters pages

Letters 2005

  • November 4: LeBlanc's Tour snub of Armstrong, The 2006 Tour de France and Lance, Le Tour de malcontent, Tour de France 2006, What TdF?, Le Tour wounded, Gossip ruins cycling, EPO, Exercise-induced asthma, Dick Pound and soccer, Tour of US, Tour of California, Swimming and Cycling
  • October 28: Le Tour de Malcontent, LeBlanc's Tour snub of Armstrong, Caution needed, TdF 2006, Has cycling become a honky tonk sport?, Tristan Hoffman, UN effort to fight doping in sport, UCI ProTour, Cam Jennings, Exercise-induced asthma, Chris Sheppard is a class act, Why?, Crocodile Trophy - worlds' toughest race?
  • October 14: Infallible doping tests?, Get on with your life, Doping. What else?, Pound versus Armstrong, Hamilton, etc, L'Equipe forgot - or not, John Lieswyn, Eddy Merckx
  • October 7: John Lieswyn, Bravo, Lieswyn, 1999 Tour de France urine samples, Allan Butler, Tyler Hamilton, Doping versus biomechanical enhancements, Doping control, McQuaid's image, Comment on Chris Horner at Zuri Metzgete, Scientific proof, Thank goodness Moreno lost, What has happened to American Cycling?, Pound versus Armstrong, Hamilton, etc, French bias
  • September 30: Petacchi and McEwen's reactions, Ale-Jet, Ale-Jet blasts his critics..., Petacchi's class, Petacchi, Bravo, Lieswyn, French bias, Tom Danielson, What has happened to American Cycling?, Quote of the year, At the heart of the matter, Lance's EPO tests, Doping control, On Pound and the like, Pound Ill informed, Verbruggen is wrong, Doping and apparel
  • September 23: A quick thanks, Australian worlds team, Go Mick!, Infighting, Pound Ill informed, WADA mess, Heras and the Giro, Verbruggen is wrong, Chris Sheppard busted for EPO, Explaining increases in performance, Quote of the year, Vuelta rest day observations
  • September 16: Vuelta rest day observations, Australian worlds team, Explaining the increases in performance, Debate settled, doping lives on, Samuel Sanchez, Scientific proof, The perfect crime, Another topic please,, Doping, Illegal motivation, Illegal motivation - another possibility, Lance and the Tour de France, Drug use, Alternate Universe, WADA, Chris Sheppard busted for EPO, Just Do It
  • September 9: The debate rages, Bad for cycling, Lance and the Tour de France, EPO Testing and Haematocrit, Doping, Illegal motivation, Lance the Man, Armstrong and doping, Question for Dick Pound..., Land of the Free, home of the Brave, Lance, I have a better idea, Where are the results?, Armstrong's Tour comeback, Don't make that mistake, Lance, Response to the test
  • September 2: Lance Armstrong, all-American boy, Doping, Claude Droussent lies, L'Equipe credibility, Lance versus Jan, Jan versus Lance, Cold fusion and Lance, The perfect crime, EPO and the Wink Wink Standard, Germany owed four yellow jerseys?, Lance, cycling and cancer, Lance issues, The whole Lance doping issue, Neither defense nor attack, The test, Land of the Free, home of the Brave, Armstong couldn't come clean, Summarising the Lance situation, Lance's tests, Keep an open mind, Lance and doping, Check results before you wreck yourself, Seeing is believing, L'Equipe and ASO, and Lance, Lance and EPO, Aussie perspective on the upcoming worlds, A rave rather than a rant
  • August 26: Lance and LeBlanc, Lance versus France, Can of worms story, The Test, Benoit Salmon wins the 1999 Tour, The perfect crime, Armstrong tests positive, L'Equipe and ASO, Lance rubbish, Lance and the French yellow press, Armstrong, EPO and WADA, Lance Downgrading Armstrong victories, Lance doping garbage, Lance versus Jan, Doping, Six stages to win the 99 tour, EPO test under scrutiny, Lance irony, Lance as a spokesman, Cyclists and politicians, Verbruggen's campaign to elect his successor, John Lieswyn, Can of worms, Americans in Paris
  • August 19: Ned Overend, Guidi positive, What is going on at Phonak?, Ullrich's riding style, How about credibility from both sides?, Lieswyn's gesture
  • August 12: Pro Tour 2006, Credibility from both sides?, Zabel leaves T-Mobile, Chris Horner, Ullrich's riding style, Well done Wayne!, Armstrong and class, Possible correlations
  • August 5: Zabel leaves T-Mobile, Thanks from a survivor, Bicycle safety, Message for Chris Horner, Perspective, Discovery in ninth, Tech, Armstrong and class, The King of July!, Heras through rose colored glasses, Possible correlations
  • July 29: Perspective, France and Lance's Legacy, Armstrong and class, Best Wishes to Louise, Levi's Diary, Heras through rose colored glasses, The King of July, Here we go again!, Treat Lance like the others, Tech, Lance Armstrong's time trial equation, Life begins at 30
  • July 22: McEwen - villain to superhero, Underdogs and overdogs at the Tour, Big George, George Hincape, Hincapie's stage win, Cadel's Tour memory, What the fans would love to see, Is Godefroot really NOT the man?, A true classic, Phonak's poor sportsmanship, Phonak double standards, My new hero, Discovery Channel tactics, Lance Infomercial?, Treat Lance like the others, TdF sprint finishes, Leaky Gas?, Little black box
  • July 15: The best seat in the house, Joseba Beloki, Message for Chris Horner, Treat Lance like the others, Lance Infomercial?, McEwen defense, Rail lines in the TdF, Ruse Discovered?, Discovery's unanimous breakdown, IS Jan really the man?, Cycling socks, Patrick Lefevre quit your whining, Armstrong and class, Leaky Gas?, TdF sprint finishes, Who is in charge of the UCI?, Tires and slippery roads, Response to the Vowels of Cycling, Little black box
  • July 8: McEwen defends himself, Tires and slippery roads, Random test on Lance Armstrong, French Government dope controls, The Pro Tour and Grand Tours, Tour de France's early finish?, Here we go again!, Thank you, Ed Kriege, Lance Infomercial?, No, the other Merckx!, The Vowels of Cycling, Armstrong's pre-Tour communiqués, Armstrong and class
  • July 1: No, the other Merckx!, Armstrong's pre-Tour communiqués, The Vowels of Cycling, Figures of merit - TdF tipping, Lance Infomercial?, Daily Terror, Sydney article, Why Michael Rogers will be awesome with T-Mobile, I love it!, MTB news, Twins
  • June 24: Sydney article, Hit and run on cyclists - Australia's new blood sport?, Another fatal hit and run on Australian cyclists, How can Ullrich win the Tour?, Drop Verbruggen, The second American, When the Tour heads up, Droppin' the Kilo!, Kilo or no go, What is Michael Rogers thinking?, Rogers to T-Mobile, For the love of god don't do it Mick!, The first yellow jersey, Horner Impressive, Leave T-Mobile/Fassa Bortolo, renew your career!, Horner's stage win at the Tour de Suisse, Bobby Julich, Daily Terror, Hell on Wheels review
  • June 17: Droppin' the Kilo!, Killing the kilo and 500, The kilo, Axing the Kilo?, The track Time Trials, The first yellow jersey, Armstrong and Class, The year of the comeback, Horner's stage win at the Tour de Suisse
  • June 10: The year of the comeback, An open letter to Cadel Evans, How Ullrich can win the Tour, USPRO/Liberty, Lance, the Tour and the Giro, Lance and the Tour, Show us your discards Godefroot!, Armstrong and Class, Ivan's training ride, Giro comments
  • June 3: Giro comments, Giro excitement vs Tour blah, Ivan Basso, Ivan's training ride, Discovering the future, Jose Rujano, Savoldelli vs Simoni, How Ullrich can win the Tour, Eddy Merckx Interview, Johan Bruyneel, Show us your discards Godefroot!, Improving Pro Tour Team Rankings, Lance and the Tour, Armstrong and class
  • May 27: Giro excitement vs Tour blah, Great Giro!, Double or nothing..., Colle delle Finestre and a Cipo farewell, Joseba Beloki, Ivan's training ride, Hell on Wheels, Matt Wittig, How Ullrich can win the Tour, UCI fines, Armstrong and class, Eddy Merckx Interview, The disappointment of Viatcheslav Ekimov, You have let us down Paolo
  • May 20: Colle delle Finestre tactics, Rogues, It just keeps happening, Davis Phinney, Joseba Beloki, Australia - number one, You have let us down Paolo, Bettini/Cooke, What's up with pro cyclists these days?, Cipo, Cipo, Cipo, A question about team names, The disappointment of Viatcheslav Ekimov, Go Eki!
  • May 13: Hit and run, Bettini vs Cooke, Bettini's Illegal sprint, You have let us down Paolo, Giro, Bettini/Cooke, Cookie's crumble, Bjarne's right: There's only one Jens Voigt!, Jens Voigt and the blind, South Australians protest against hit-and-run death, It just keeps happening, Liberty Seguros, The disappointment of Viatcheslav Ekimov, Go Eki!, Australia - number one, Irresistible in July, UCI weight rule
  • May 6: South Australians protest against hit-and-run death, Tyler Hamilton's case, Hamilton and the facts The USADA decision on Tyler Hamilton, Tyler Hamilton, Tyler, Testing and the Virenque Comparison, How do dopers live with themselves?, General view on doping, Hamilton guilty regardless of the facts, Hamilton verdict, Tyler is good going uphill, Hamilton interview, Klöden comments, Tyler H, Simoni, Grazie Mario, Sheryl Crow, or should we say...Yoko Ono
  • April 29: South Australians protest against hit-and-run death, Tyler Hamilton's case, Hamilton and the facts The USADA decision on Tyler Hamilton, Tyler Hamilton, Tyler, Testing and the Virenque Comparison, How do dopers live with themselves?, General view on doping, Hamilton guilty regardless of the facts, Hamilton verdict, Tyler is good going uphill, Hamilton interview, Klöden comments, Tyler H, Simoni, Grazie Mario, Sheryl Crow, or should we say...Yoko Ono
  • April 22: Lance Armstrong's retirement, W is for Witchhunt, Tyler's mishandling defense, Not for real, is it?, Bad Science, Blood testing issues, Hamilton - finally a decision, Regarding the Tyler Hamilton decision, Tyler Hamilton, Satisfying Verdict for Hamilton Case, How do dopers live with themselves?, Hamilton's case, Tyler Hamilton's case, Hamilton, Hamilton verdict and a call for outside expertise, Tyler Hamilton saga..., Tour de France preview...2006!, Klöden comments, Tour de France Training, The New Dynamic Duo, Sheryl Crow, or should we say...Yoko Ono, Random Musings
  • April 15: Glenn Wilkinson, USADA and Hamilton, Bergman; so sad, ProTour leader's jersey, That's a Jersey?, Too many chiefs?, Track World Championships, What do you think?
  • April 8: The New Dynamic Duo, Boonen's Hairdo, Viral infections and antibiotics, George Hincapie, What do you think?, Track World Championships, VDB?, A little bit more about blood doping, Blood testing issues
  • April 1: Well done Ale-jet, Eyes of tigers..., Viral infections and antibiotics, Let's talk about cycling…, What's worth talking about in cycling?, First Ride of the season, The New Dynamic Duo, Blood testing issues, Sydney Thousand, UCI Pro Tour Grand Theft, not Grand Tour
  • March 18: The Forgotten Hero!, Way to go Bobby, Bobby J, Lance has lost the ‘Eye of the tiger’, Blood testing issues and Hamilton, With all Due Respect, All this Lance Talk..., Is Lance getting soft?
  • March 11: Blood testing issues and Hamilton, Cycling on TV, In Defence of UCI president Hein Verbruggen, Defending the Pro Tour?, Is Lance getting soft?, Lance has lost the "eye of the tiger"
  • March 4: In Defence of the Pro-Tour, Grand Tours back down...for now, Armstrong and Simeoni,Help - what’s on the TV?, Cycling on TV, Lance Defends His Title!, Hamilton movie role downplayed, Blood testing issues and Hamilton, I really don't know when it happened
  • February 25: Lance Defends His Title!, Build it and tear it down?, Build, dismantle and donate!, Lance's Hour Record attempt, I really don't know when it happened, Can't get enough!, Dream on
  • February 18: Build it and tear it down?, Remember Marco, One Reason I Love Cycling, The ongoing Hour Record Saga, Lance’s Hour Record attempt, Can't get enough!
  • February 11: One Reason I Love Cycling, Francisco Cuevas, F-One - Come down to earth Lance!, Armstrong and the Hour, Can't get enough!, Greatest of all time
  • February 4: F-One - Come down to earth Lance!, Armstrong and the Hour, Armstrong and Simeoni, Can't get enough!, Help, Greatest of all time Eddy is King, but who is second best?
  • January 28: "I am the greatest of all time", Armstrong and the Hour Record, F-One - Come down to earth Lance!, Lance Drug Probe, Armstrong and Simeoni, Can’t get enough!, Help, NBC's 2004 RAAM Coverage, Doping, Crash distance from 1km to 3km, Eddy is King, but who is second best?
  • January 21: Professional Cyclists, Der Kaiser's Goals, Jan Ullrich's problem = Lance, Rider of the Year, Crash distance from 1km to 3km, Help, Lance vs. Eddy
  • January 14: Der Kaiser's goals, Help, Foreign stage races, Lance vs. Eddy, Tour '05, Rider of the Year, Best bikes for heavy riders, Quick Step helmets
  • January 7: Death of Dmitri Neliubin, Der Kaiser’s goals, Rider of the Year, Best bikes for heavy riders, Who's Greater? Come on now!, Virenque "most charismatic"?, Downhilling, Downhill time trial, Trendy cyclists, No flat tyres, Spring classics trip advice, Bettini's trainer
  • January 3: Spring classics trip advice, Big Bear ends downhilling, Armstrong and Simeoni, Holding teams accountable, Downhill time trial, Trendy cyclists, Bettini's trainer, No flat tyres

Letters 2004

  • December 24 letters - Why are cyclists so trendy?, Business and cycling, Big Bear ends downhilling, Off-bike weight gain, No flat tires, Armstrong and Simeoni
  • December 17 letters - Business and cycling, Tom versus Axel , Big Bear ends downhilling, Shane Perkins, Spring classics trip advice, Tyler Hamilton, Phonak and the UCI, Why are cyclists so trendy?, Mark Webber interview, Armstrong and Simeoni, Injured and missing it: an update, Clyde Sefton
  • December 10 letters - Why are cyclists so trendy?, Big Bear ends downhilling, Floyd's choices?, Merckx, fit and trim, Pound must go, Spring classics trip advice, Tyler Hamilton, Phonak and the UCI, Punishment: Vandenbroucke vs Hamilton, Prosthetic hip, Armstrong and Simeoni, Dave Fuentes, Homeopathy, Jeremy Yates, TDF coverage for Australia, Weight limits and maintenance, Mark Webber interview
  • December 3 letters - Domestiques vs Lieutenants, Tyler Hamilton, Phonak and the UCI, Dave Fuentes, Santa vs Hairy Guy, Why are cyclists so trendy?, Mark French and homeopathy, Shane Perkins, Jeremy Yates, Weight limits and maintenance, UCI regulations, Armstrong and Simeoni, Prosthetic hip
  • November 26 letters - Mark French and homeopathy, Two big guns in one team, Tyler Hamilton case, Bartoli's retirement, Dave Fuentes, Shane Perkins, Merckx and Armstrong, Training like Lance, Lance Armstrong, Why are cyclists so trendy?, Phonak gets what it deserves, Armstrong and Simeoni, Bike weight, Spouseless riders, Mary McConneloug, Adam Craig, Mark Webber interview, Santa vs Hairy Guy
  • November 19 letters - Tyler Hamilton case, Phonak gets what it deserves, Are you there Mr Coates?, Bike Weight, Merckx and Maertens make up, Heart troubles, Where to find cycling spouses, Mark Webber interview, Lance Armstrong, Where's Greg?, What ever happened to..., Why are cyclists so trendy?, Armstrong and Simeoni, l'Etape du Tour registration, Still Laughing
  • November 12 letters - Why Armstrong will ride the 2005 Tour, Scott Sunderland, Why are cyclists so trendy?, Armstrong and Simeoni, Where to find cycling spouses, Lance on Italian selection, Heart troubles, l'Etape du Tour registration, Tour 2005 team time trial, What ever happened to..., Love and a yellow bike
  • November 5 letters - Love and a yellow bike, Tour 2005, Where to find cycling spouses, Why are cyclists so trendy?, Lance on Italian selection, Armstrong and Simeoni, Tour of Southland, Construction technique for veloway, Heart troubles, l'Etape du Tour registration, Rahsaan Bahati
  • Letters Index – The complete index to every letters page on