Recently on Cyclingnews.com
Photo ©: Bettini
Form & Fitness Q & A
Got a question about fitness, training, recovery from injury or a related subject?
Drop us a line at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please include as much information about yourself as possible, including your
age, sex, and type of racing or riding. Due to the volume of questions we receive,
we regret that we are unable to answer them all.
Fitness questions and answers for February 14, 2005
The Cyclingnews form & fitness panel
Carrie Cheadle, MA (www.carriecheadle.com)
is a Sports Psychology consultant who has dedicated her career to helping
athletes of all ages and abilities perform to their potential. Carrie
specialises in working with cyclists, in disciplines ranging from track
racing to mountain biking. She holds a bachelors degree in Psychology
from Sonoma State University as well as a masters degree in Sport Psychology
from John F. Kennedy University.
Dave Palese (www.davepalese.com)
is a USA Cycling licensed coach and masters' class road racer with 16
years' race experience. He coaches racers and riders of all abilities
from his home in southern Maine, USA, where he lives with his wife Sheryl,
daughter Molly, and two cats, Miranda and Mu-Mu.
Kelby Bethards, MD received a Bachelor of
Science in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University (1994) before
obtaining an M.D. from the University of Iowa College of Medicine in 2000.
Has been a racing cyclist 'on and off' for 20 years, and when time allows,
he races Cat 3 and 35+. He is a team physician for two local Ft Collins,
CO, teams, and currently works Family Practice in multiple settings: rural,
urgent care, inpatient and the like.
Fiona Lockhart (www.trainright.com)
is a USA Cycling Expert Coach, and holds certifications from USA Weightlifting
(Sports Performance Coach), the National Strength and Conditioning Association
(Certified Strength and Conditioning Coach), and the National Academy
for Sports Nutrition (Primary Sports Nutritionist). She is the Sports
Science Editor for Carmichael Training Systems, and has been working in
the strength and conditioning and endurance sports fields for over 10
years; she's also a competitive mountain biker.
Eddie Monnier (www.velo-fit.com)
is a USA Cycling certified Elite Coach and a Category II racer. He holds
undergraduate degrees in anthropology (with departmental honors) and philosophy
from Emory University and an MBA from The Wharton School of Business.
Eddie is a proponent of training with power. He coaches cyclists (track,
road and mountain bike) of all abilities and with wide ranging goals (with
and without power meters). He uses internet tools to coach riders from
David Fleckenstein, MPT (www.physiopt.com)
is a physical therapist practicing in Boise, ID. His clients have included
World and U.S. champions, Olympic athletes and numerous professional athletes.
He received his B.S. in Biology/Genetics from Penn State and his Master's
degree in Physical Therapy from Emory University. He specializes in manual
medicine treatment and specific retraining of spine and joint stabilization
musculature. He is a former Cat I road racer and Expert mountain biker.
Since 1986 Steve Hogg (www.cyclefitcentre.com)
has owned and operated Pedal Pushers, a cycle shop specialising in rider
positioning and custom bicycles. In that time he has positioned riders
from all cycling disciplines and of all levels of ability with every concievable
cycling problem.They include World and National champions at one end of
the performance spectrum to amputees and people with disabilities at the
Current riders that Steve has positioned include Davitamon-Lotto's Nick
Gates, Discovery's Hayden Roulston, National Road Series champion, Jessica
Ridder and National and State Time Trial champion, Peter Milostic.
Pamela Hinton has a bachelor's degree in Molecular
Biology and a doctoral degree in Nutritional Sciences, both from the University
of Wisconsin-Madison. She did postdoctoral training at Cornell University
and is now an assistant professor of Nutritional Sciences at the University
of Missouri-Columbia where she studies the effects of iron deficiency
on adaptations to endurance training and the consequences of exercise-associated
changes in menstrual function on bone health.
Pam was an All-American in track while at the UW. She started cycling
competitively in 2003 and is the defending Missouri State Road Champion.
Pam writes a nutrition column for Giana Roberge's Team Speed Queen Newsletter.
Dario Fredrick (www.wholeathlete.com)
is an exercise physiologist and head coach for Whole Athlete™. He is a
former category 1 & semi-pro MTB racer. Dario holds a masters degree in
exercise science and a bachelors in sport psychology.
Scott Saifer (www.wenzelcoaching.com)
has a Masters Degree in exercise physiology and sports psychology and
has personally coached over 300 athletes of all levels in his 10 years
of coaching with Wenzel Coaching.
Kendra Wenzel (www.wenzelcoaching.com)
is a head coach with Wenzel Coaching with 17 years of racing and coaching
experience and is coauthor of the book Bike Racing 101.
Richard Stern (www.cyclecoach.com)
is Head Coach of Richard Stern Training, a Level 3 Coach with the Association
of British Cycling Coaches, a Sports Scientist, and a writer. He has been
professionally coaching cyclists and triathletes since 1998 at all levels
from professional to recreational. He is a leading expert in coaching
with power output and all power meters. Richard has been a competitive
cyclist for 20 years
Andy Bloomer (www.cyclecoach.com)
is an Associate Coach and sport scientist with Richard Stern Training.
He is a member of the Association of British Cycling Coaches (ABCC) and
a member of the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences (BASES).
In his role as Exercise Physiologist at Staffordshire University Sports
Performance Centre, he has conducted physiological testing and offered
training and coaching advice to athletes from all sports for the past
4 years. Andy has been a competitive cyclist for many years.
Kim Morrow (www.elitefitcoach.com)
has competed as a Professional Cyclist and Triathlete, is a certified
USA Cycling Elite Coach, a 4-time U.S. Masters National Road Race Champion,
and a Fitness Professional.
Her coaching group, eliteFITcoach, is based out of the Southeastern United
States, although they coach athletes across North America. Kim also owns
a resource for cyclists, multisport athletes & endurance coaches around
the globe, specializing in helping cycling and multisport athletes find
Advice presented in Cyclingnews' fitness pages is provided for educational
purposes only and is not intended to be specific advice for individual
athletes. If you follow the educational information found on Cyclingnews,
you do so at your own risk. You should consult with your physician before
beginning any exercise program.
Creating meals that count
Crank Arm Length
Back pain solution
Rollers vs. trainers
Creating meals that count
I just finished reading Pam Hinton's response to the Vitamin question from
Jan 31st, 2005.
I tend to use vitamins and meal replacement shakes because I never make myself
Would she have any suggestions on the Ultimate Cookbook for the male bachelor?
Am I the only guy that doesn't know how to cook, has an empty fridge and pantry,
and only eats what he can grab out of a box?
Pam Hinton replies:
The "Ultimate Cookbook" for the male bachelor? There's a plethora to choose
from: Cooking for Dummies, Vegetarian Cooking for Dummies, Cast Iron Cooking
for Dummies, Cooking with Spices for Dummies, Cooking with Kids for Dummies,
Cooking Around the World All-in-One For Dummies, Pressure Cookers for Dummies.
That should get you started. If I can learn to change a flat tire, switch
out a cassette and adjust my rear derailleur then you can learn to cook.
Using traditional gender roles as an excuse to remain helpless is a cop out.
(or so I've been told). If you can light a burner, nuke things and wield a
knife, you are capable of cooking just about anything. I know several guys
who are excellent cooks, but they don't use cookbooks. As they do with most
things in life, they make it up as they go along. Even though these guys don't
rely on Joy of Cooking, they still share recipes. I can recall more than one
long, hard training ride where the two guys riding behind me chatted about
recipes for a good half an hour. You don't have to become a gourmet to cook
healthful meals for yourself.
Start by stocking your fridge and pantry with foods that require little more
preparation than opening the box. Pasta and rice only require the ability
to boil water, and you can buy fresh salad greens and vegetables already washed,
peeled, and diced. Use fresh fruit, milk, and yoghurt to make your own smoothies
instead of meal replacement shakes.
Or, you could just ignore everything we know about sports nutrition, swear
off cooking forever, and follow the diet of the most loved (and hated) road
racer in the state of Missouri. By his pronouncements, Butthead lives on and
for sheet cake. In fact, he'd eat the stuff for breakfast, lunch and dinner,
but he has a good woman to cook for him.
Crank Arm Length
I am near in physical stature to this - male, 225lbs, 6'3'', 34" inseam, size
47 shoe, about 18" for hip to knee distance. I have wondered if I should/would
be better off with a longer crank though I like to spin. I am running 175mm
cranks now and typically spin 100-110rpm.
Steve Hogg replies:
There is a school of thought that the ideal crank length is 0.216 of inseam
length. If applied, this means that most small people are riding somewhere
near their " correct " crank length while tall people such as yourself are
riding " short " cranks in a proportional sense. An American named Ron Haney
has taken this idea of crank length much further in terms of acquiring knowledge
through his own research than anyone I am aware of. Ron does not necessarily
believe in inseam x0.216 but finds that it is somewhere about right for a
majority of people.
Most bike riders have a tendency to favour one side, some only slightly,
some obviously. This is self evident to anyone who uses their eyes in a bunch.
The guts of what Ron has discovered, is that let's assume the case of someone
who hangs slightly to the right; what Ron has found is that as crank length
increases there will be a crossover point where the individual sits square
on the seat. If the crank length is too long they will start to hang to the
left. So Ron's assumption and experience is that the correct crank length
in an individual sense is the one where the rider sits square without any
help or intervention.
This is the 30 second explanation, the half hour version is quite detailed
and would do many peoples heads in because it contradicts long held beliefs
that don't necessarily have any foundation but are none the ess vehemently
When Ron first contacted me, we seemed to agree on all of the big things
but I thought he was a nice bloke with a crank length fetish. As we have become
better acquainted and exchanged more information, I have realised that his
thinking and methods are first class and there may well be something to what
he says. I am waiting for winter when I have more time to go further down
the Ron's path as a self-experiment. Once done, I will report on the results.
Ron has met with a lot of opposition with his attempts to propound his ideas
to a wider audience. Some of this is because a lot of people have a dogmatic
attachment to ideas without any rational basis. Some too of it is because
the practical application of Ron's ideas mean that for many people of average
size or larger, the only way they could make things work with safety in a
racing situation is have a frame made to allow for the extra clearance required
between foot and front wheel and pedal and ground when using 180+ mm cranks,
many of which need to be custom made. This puts many off straight away which
is a pity as his thinking deserves a wider audience.. I don't necessarily
agree with Ron about crank length but he has some very well reasoned arguments.
So much so that I would not dare say he is wrong without putting his ideas
to the test in detail. As I said I plan to do this.
Eddie Monnier replies:
Given your inseam length and preference to spin, I would suggest keeping
your 175 mm cranks.
Back pain solution
In response to several letters you've run recently on back pain, I have found
that the thing that works most effectively for me is doing strength exercises.
Back extensions, dead lifts, and good mornings done on a regular basis pretty
much eliminates any pain I have experienced.
Somerville, MA USA
Dave Fleckenstein replies:
While those exercises may be O.K. for a relatively healthy spine, they will
actually promote pathology in a spine that has had a significant injury. There
has been a great deal of research performed to determine what initiates spine
pathology, why it is so recurrent, etc... I would highly recommend looking
at a book called "Therapeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilization
in Low Back Pain" by Richardson, Jull, Hodges, and Hines.
It is the definitive text on current concepts in conservative spine management.
For a more reader- and athlete-friendly text with some excellent exercises
for the more healthy spine, I recommend "Functional Training for Sports" by
Michael Boyle which has some of the exercises that you have mentioned, but
they are added in as the final blocks in a stability pyramid that focuses
on developing the smaller stability musculature from the first book. Thanks
Saddle choice is, of course, a very personal thing. However, it seems that
most new saddles being developed these days are mainly flat rather than the
more classic curved shapes like the Turbomatic range so the choices are being
made by the manufacturers. An exception to this is the much lauded Fizik Aliante
which replicates the Turbomatic shape almost to the millimetre when you put
them side by side. The Turbomatic is one of the most popular saddles ever in
the pro ranks and never gets a bad review (other than it's weight). In fact,
in customer and magazine reviews both these saddles seem to be at the top of
the pile in terms of comfort. For example, on www.roadbikereview.com the ever-popular
Flite gets an average rating of 3.38/5 whereas the Turbomatic is the only saddle
to receive and average score of 5/5.
If these curved saddles are so comfortable for so many why are they rarely
made nowadays? Other than a flat saddle having more positions, if you don't
tend to move around much is there any other performance reason why a flat saddle
is better than a curved one or is it, as I would suspect, simply a case of whatever
works for you?
I am on a Flite, which is only barely acceptable in terms of comfort to me
and have tried the Arione, which also doesn't suit, so I am thinking of taking
the plunge into the world of curved saddles - it may hold me in the sweet spot
better. I have tried every possible combination of settings for both saddles.
Steve Hogg replies:
I understand what you are saying and largely agree, but contrary to what
you are saying, the basic Flite does have a noticeable dip in it as does the
Arione that you have found not to your liking. Some of the more padded versions
of Flites, like the Trans Am and Gelflow make the dip less apparent, but the
underlying shell is the same, with or without a perineal cut out. The Aliante
is actually based on Giro's Vitesse ladies seat. A few years ago, the manufacturer
noticed a number of road pros using Vitesses in the Vuelta. Subsequently they
used that same shell shape in lighter material along with lighter rails and
came up with the Aliante. I prefer seats with a dip too, but have found some
with too much of a dip. By this I mean that the rear of the seat tips forward
too steeply and the riders pelvis is tipped forward, pushing the perineum
against the rise out of the dip at the front.
I used Turbos, Turbomatics and variants for nearly 20 years up until a few
years ago. It took me about two years to find a seat that I was totally happy
with. I won't bother you with the reason why I stopped using Turbomatics.
Seat choice is a very personal issue and I don't think it is a simple as flat
seats are less comfortable than seats with a dip in them. That is no doubt
true for some but not so for others. Additionally, the underlying shell often
dictates the feel rather than the apparent flatness or otherwise.
After trying a large number of seats, the one I eventually chose to replace
my Turbomatics with was the SLR Trans Am 185 gm. I couldn't care less about
the perineal cutout in my own case, but although it appears flat along its
length, it does not feel like it when I sit on it. It actually feels like
my Turbos used to. Another issue that is as important is the shape across
the rear of the area of the seat where we bear most of our weight. Some seats
roll down from the centre to the edges very quickly, which promotes instability
in a lot of riders. The San Marco Era springs to mind in this regard. I see
a lot of Era riders hanging to one side or the other slightly, for no apparent
reason once I investigate, other than their choice of seat. At the other end
of the spectrum where there are riders who inherently hang to one side for
whatever reason, using seats like the Selle Italia Pro Link Trans Am which
is very flat across the rear, can be one of the measures taken to get these
type of riders stable and square on the seat.
There are more seats out there than ever before, and certainly some of them
seem to be designed more for a 'look' than anything else. The saying 'one
mans meat is another mans poison' definitely applies to seats. Personally
my butt doesn't like Flites either, but I know plenty who swear by them. Best
of luck with your search.
Last year I was suffering a lot from perineum pain and ended up with a Flite
Max Trans Am which was just bearable with the cut out. After reading some of
your advice I worked out that the problem was not the seats but how I was sitting
on them. I had too much reach and my hips were rolling forward so that I was
balancing on the small pelvic bones in between the legs rather than the sit
bones. Ouch! In that way I was also not utilising my glutes properly either.
So, I shortened the reach and got some pliates exercises form my physio to correct
my hip position and I now sit at the back of my seat which has made a big difference
to comfort and feel. I am definitely going to build on the pilates as I feel
it provides me with a much stronger pedalling position. Incidentally, as well
as sitting at the back of the seat now I have also moved the seat back 0.5 cm.
I think the combination puts me about -1.5 cm KOPS and it feels much better.
Thanks for letting us know that KOPS is a guide only!
I have just the past two days been trying the Aliante and Turbomatic. I agree
with you about too much dip. I always thought that given my perineum problems
that I would never be suited to a saddle with dip. The dip on the Aliante is
slightly more pronounced than the Turbo and I find it a little bit tight - there
is perineum pressure no matter what level the nose is: it is either sticking
up too far or if you angle the nose down you slide down the ramp at the back
and it is worse. However, the Turbomatic feels really, really good on the sit
bones which is, as you say, critical.
The Max Flite and Pro Link are too wide for me and I sit on top of them where
as because the Turbomatic is less flat and the width is right at the back I
feel that I can get to the back of the saddle and still pedal comfortably and
freely and the nose doesn't really curl up until 2/3 towards the front where
you don't sit. Also, one thing that a curved saddle does is provide you with
a reference point so that you know where you are on the saddle which I quite
like - you can feel for the sweet spot. I also like the firmer shape - the Aliante
was a little squishy for me. So, although I need to put in some more miles on
it I think I might have found my saddle (although I will try the SLR Trans Am
as well). It is heavy and discontinued by Selle Italia but I think I may have
to stock up for the years ahead and find some weight saving elsewhere. Am I
mad to go for an old saddle like this one when everything else on my good bike
is cutting edge? I notice that a heap of the pros on the SI teams use Turbomatics
so there must be something in the shape.
Steve Hogg replies:
A rider's best friend is a comfortable seat. I get a lot of people asking seat
advice in the shop and the best advice I have is what you have indicated you
are doing. Find what you are happy with and if the manufacturer discontinues
them, buy a few for the years ahead. A heavy comfortable seat will contribute
more to performance than a lighter less comfortable seat. Ideally, we should
all look for a light comfortable seat and many can find this, but bottom line
is comfort wins every time and aids performance. That is why a fair number
of pros ride heavier seats.
A few years ago a rider I had positioned was riding for a Div 1 pro team
in Europe. They were sponsored by San Marco and used Rolls, steel rails, 20+
year old design and not light. A new season brought new bikes and a lightweight
San Marco seat [I will probably get into strife if I say which one]. He told
me that the team used them for a fortnight and out of a squad of twenty-something
riders, all but three wanted their Rolls back.
As another pro said to me when I told him the seat I wanted him on was not
particularly light, " I don't care about light. I ride pave', I want comfortable
and unbreakable" That about sums it up.
Regarding KOPS, I don't think it is even a guide. Most need to sit behind
that point, some substantially. The most important thing about bike position
is balance. If you can bear your weight at the lowest metabolic cost, then
more effort can be devoted to propelling the bike, rather than on maintaining
I am a male cyclist living in California, 36 years of age and am getting back
into racing after quite a long layoff. During the past year, I have been training
for racing, but am having positioning problems with my current road bicycle.
One thing I noticed is that, although my height is 5'11", my wingspan is 6'2".
Although I have a 57cm top tube with a 120 mm long stem, I am constantly trying
to find a comfortable hand position on the bars. I have raised and lowered my
bars numerous times, but I still have hand numbness and pain on almost every
ride. In addition, I have horrible adductor pain in both legs on almost every
ride I'm on. I constantly feel like I'm fighting with the saddle - trying to
find a comfortable position - most of the time, I feel like I'm pushing my rear
end over the back of the saddle. Although I've changed the saddle and the saddle
height numerous times, I still can't seem to find a comfortable riding position.
During 40-50 mile long rides, I need to stop at least twice in order to stretch
my hamstrings/adductors and relieve the pressure on my hands. Any ideas on what
I can do in order to stop the Adductor pain and hand numbness? Does it sound
like my reach may be too short for my wingspan? And is there a correlation between
the two - if I have too short of a reach to the bars, is this a possible cause
of the adductor pain? Thanks for your help!
Steve Hogg replies:
A 'wingspan' as you term it of 6' 2" for your height could indicate longer
than average arms, but equally it could indicate broad shoulders. It is unlikely
based on what you have said, that arm length is your problem. Pelvic stability
on the seat certainly is though. Go back through the archive and look at any
posts in the last seven or eight months about numb hands, bike fit, seat height
or position, cleat position etc. The hand numbness is caused either by a seat
that is too far forward transferring your weight onto the upper body, that
then has to be supported by the arms and/or bars that are too low or too far
The adductor pain is caused by you rocking and rolling on the seat. Adductors
bear on the pelvis and can be enlisted on a bike if there is a challenge to
pelvic stability. What can cause this challenge? It could be poor structural
function in the hips and pelvis and the musculature that controls them and/or
a seat that is too far forward and possibly too high as well.
Is your adductor pain and hand numbness more pronounced on one side?
If the answer is yes you can just about bet on having hip or pelvic asymmetries
of function. I would suggest that you find a good physiotherapist of similar
with a cycling background or experience and have yourself structurally assessed.
Ask plenty of questions and don't leave until you have a clear understanding
of your structural shortcomings and their implications. Next, is there anyone
in your area who has a reputation for bike positioning to solve problems?
If so seek them out and have your position sorted out. Ideally the right people
will take a capability based rather than measurement based approach to positioning.
Rodney then asked:
Thank you very much for the information. Yes, I have been having all kinds
of trouble on the bike during this past year. I just can't seem to get comfortable.
I went through the last year or so on your archive looking for the posts on
hand numbness and adductor soreness - that's what led me to conclude that there
might be a correlation between the two problems. However, maybe not. I have
my seat slammed all the way back - it's been like that for more than a year
now. I ride a LeMond frame too, so the seat angle is pretty slack as well (72.5
degrees). However, I still have quite a bit of pressure on my hands/wrists from
the bars. Not only that, but many times I feel like I need to ride with my butt
hanging over the back of the saddle - and at times, I feel like I might even
slide completely off the back end of it! Although the saddle is completely level
- no downward or upward tilt to it - I still can't seem to get comfortable...even
with different saddles. And the adductor pain and hand numbness are equally
prevalent on both sides...no one side hurts more than the other. Do you think,
after having a professional look at my position on the bicycle, that increasing
the reach to the bars (longer top tube/longer stem) might relieve any of these
problems? I'll try lowering the saddle a bit too to see if that helps.
Thank you for all of your help Steve - I really appreciate it!
Steve Hogg replies:
Another possibility that occurs to me is that given you have issues with
stability on the seat, you may be enlisting the arms and shoulder complex
in an effort to brace against the movement of your butt laterally. The first
priority is to solve the adductor issue. That and the hand numbness may be
linked, equally they may not be. Your effective seat tube angle is 71.5 degrees
with where you have the seat assuming you use a standard offset post. You
may need to be further back. Equally as you suggest, it may be that you need
a longer stem. You should have read in the archives about the 'balance test'.
Can you pass that? If not, then either your pelvic function is severely compromised
or the seat is not far enough back. If you want to try moving further back,
the FSA SL 220, FSA K - Force carbon and the Selcof Bi-Position are the best
posts out there in terms of extra offset of the seat rail clamp. All offer
about 20-22 mm more than standard. If you can pass the balance test then the
solution is to either raise your bars or lengthen the stem or perhaps both.
If your upper body is too far over the bars your arms will have to support
that weight, even is it is not a lot at an unfavourable angle. If you have
any more than slight perineal pressure, raise the nose of the seat 1 - 2 degrees.
This will help. Dial gauge angle finders are available at most hardware stores
here, so I assume the same in the States. As I said before, the first order
of business is to have that structural assessment so you know what the state
of play is. Scott Saifer, one of the panellists is in California as I see
you are. He does a bit of rider positioning too. I am copying him this email.
If you get stuck and are not making progress with your issues, you could do
a lot worse than to contact him via this forum with a view to having him have
a look at you.
Rollers vs. trainers
Can you give summary of what you see as the advantages and disadvantages of
using rollers vs. trainers for winter indoor training? Also, I have heard that
hooking a bike up to a trainer can be hard on the fatigue life of the bike's
frame. Is there any truth to that?
I ride for fitness and fun and manage about 4500kms a year split between commuting
and touring in the Rockies.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Eddie Monnier replies:
I encourage my athletes to have both a trainer and a set of rollers if it's
within their financial means. The latter are great for workouts focused on
pedaling drills, recovery rides, and up to medium length rides of endurance
or tempo intensity. A good set of rollers often has a more road-like feel
than a trainer.
While some athletes can do very hard workouts on rollers, for most the risk
of riding off the rollers is considerable. For high intensity indoor rides,
I prefer the trainer for safety reasons. Some trainers have a more road like
feel than others based on the type of load (eg - fluid vs. magnetic) and size
of the flywheel, but most have greater resistance than you'll experience on
the road (ie - it's harder to sustain 20 mph on the trainer than the road).
Whether on a trainer or set of rollers, make sure you have a few hand towels
and a high volume fan (or two) because you will get drenched even in an hour-long
moderate workout indoors. Personally, I like the fans by Vornado.
I have never seen anything documenting the impact of a trainer on the life
of a frame, but I haven't really searched. Of course, the frame materials,
the amount of time spent on the trainer, the way which the frame attaches
to the trainer, as well as the type of riding done on the trainer (eg, lots
of out of the saddle riding) would all impact the amount of frame fatigue.
You will wear out (actually, create a flat spot or "square") your rear tire
more quickly, so some people like to have a rear wheel dedicated for use on
the trainer. Additionally, be sure to wipe down your after each session as
sweat can do quite a number on your frame and components.
Other Cyclingnews Form & Fitness articles